Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36500708›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Dissipation Kinetics and Safety Evaluation of Flonicamid in Four Various Types of Crops.

Tao Zhang, Yue Xu, Xuan Zhou, Xiaojie Liang, Yang Bai, Fengshou Sun, Wenwen Zhang, Ning Wang, Xiuyu Pang, Yuekun Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tao ZhangNational Wolfberry Engineering Research Center, Wolfberry Science Research Institute, Ningxia Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Yinchuan 750002, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4511-5736
Yue XuShandong Provincial Key Laboratory for Biology of Vegetable Diseases and Insect Pests, College of Plant Protection, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an 271018, China.
Xuan ZhouNational Wolfberry Engineering Research Center, Wolfberry Science Research Institute, Ningxia Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Yinchuan 750002, China.
Xiaojie LiangNational Wolfberry Engineering Research Center, Wolfberry Science Research Institute, Ningxia Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Yinchuan 750002, China.
Yang BaiResearch Center of Pesticide Environmental Toxicology, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an 271018, China.
Fengshou SunResearch Center of Pesticide Environmental Toxicology, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an 271018, China.
Wenwen ZhangResearch Center of Pesticide Environmental Toxicology, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an 271018, China.
Ning WangDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Tai'an 271016, China.
Xiuyu PangDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Tai'an 271016, China.
Yuekun LiNational Wolfberry Engineering Research Center, Wolfberry Science Research Institute, Ningxia Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Yinchuan 750002, China.
Ningxia Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences · CNShandong Agricultural University · CNShandong First Medical University · CN

Funding

the Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region Key Research and Development Programs, the Scientific and Technological Achievements Transformation Project of the Ningxia Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, the National and Provincial Innovation and Entrepren 2022BBF02012; NNKZZCGZH-2021-01-07; S202210434018S; XJZD2022010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The chemical insecticide flonicamid is widely used to control aphids on crops. Differences among crops make the universality of detection methods a particularly important consideration. The aim of this study was to establish a universal, sensitive, accurate and efficient method for the determination of flonicamid residues in peach, cucumber, cabbage and cotton. QuEChERS pretreatment was combined with ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS). A satisfactory recovery rate of 84.3-99.3% was achieved at three spiking levels, and the relative standard deviation (RSD) was 0.41-5.95%. The limit of quantification (LOQ) of flonicamid in the four matrices was 0.01 mg/kg. The residue and dissipation kinetics of flonicamid in four types of crops in various locations were determined by using the optimized method. The results showed that flonicamid had a high dissipation rate in the four different types of crops and a half-life in the different matrices and locations of 2.28-9.74 days. The terminal residue of flonicamid was lower than the maximum residue limit (MRL). The risk quotient (RQ) of flonicamid was 4.4%, which is significantly lower than 100%. This result shows that the dietary risk presented by using flonicamid at the maximum recommended dose is low and acceptable. The comprehensive long-term dietary risk assessment of flonicamid performed in this study provides a reference for the protection of consumer health and safe insecticide use.

Indexed as

InsecticidesPesticide ResiduesChromatography, High Pressure LiquidChromatography, LiquidCrops, AgriculturalHalf-LifeKineticsTandem Mass SpectrometryInsecticidesPesticide Residuesdietary risk assessmentdissipationfinal residuesflonicamidQuEChERS

Identifiers

PMID36500708
PMCPMC9738400
OpenAlexW4311675615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.