Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36500191›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Additive Manufactured Magnesium-Based Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering.

Iulian Antoniac, Veronica Manescu Paltanea, Gheorghe Paltanea, Aurora Antoniac, Iosif Vasile Nemoianu, Mircea Ionut Petrescu, Horatiu Dura, Alin Danut Bodog

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Iulian AntoniacFaculty of Material Science and Engineering, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 313 Splaiul Independentei, District 6, 060042 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-0112-3494
Veronica Manescu PaltaneaFaculty of Material Science and Engineering, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 313 Splaiul Independentei, District 6, 060042 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-2535-5698
Gheorghe PaltaneaFaculty of Electrical Engineering, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 313 Splaiul Independentei, District 6, 060042 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-3251-7146
Aurora AntoniacFaculty of Material Science and Engineering, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 313 Splaiul Independentei, District 6, 060042 Bucharest, Romania.
Iosif Vasile NemoianuFaculty of Electrical Engineering, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 313 Splaiul Independentei, District 6, 060042 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-5610-8318
Mircea Ionut PetrescuFaculty of Material Science and Engineering, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 313 Splaiul Independentei, District 6, 060042 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-1028-7709
Horatiu DuraFaculty of Medicine, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, 550169 Sibiu, Romania.
Alin Danut BodogFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 10 P-ta 1 December Street, 410073 Oradea, Romania.
Universitatea Națională de Știință și Tehnologie Politehnica București · ROAcademia Oamenilor de Știință din România · ROLucian Blaga University of Sibiu · ROUniversity of Oradea · RO

Funding

This work was supported by a grant of the Romanian Ministry of Education and Research, CNCS-UEFISCDI within PNCDI III Project number PN-III-P4-ID-PCE-2020-2591, contract: PCE100/2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) is an important technology that led to a high evolution in the manufacture of personalized implants adapted to the anatomical requirements of patients. Due to a worldwide graft shortage, synthetic scaffolds must be developed. Regarding this aspect, biodegradable materials such as magnesium and its alloys are a possible solution because the second surgery for implant removal is eliminated. Magnesium (Mg) exhibits mechanical properties, which are similar to human bone, biodegradability in human fluids, high biocompatibility, and increased ability to stimulate new bone formation. A current research trend consists of Mg-based scaffold design and manufacture using AM technologies. This review presents the importance of biodegradable implants in treating bone defects, the most used AM methods to produce Mg scaffolds based on powder metallurgy, AM-manufactured implants properties, and in vitro and in vivo analysis. Scaffold properties such as biodegradation, densification, mechanical properties, microstructure, and biocompatibility are presented with examples extracted from the recent literature. The challenges for AM-produced Mg implants by taking into account the available literature are also discussed.

Indexed as

additive manufacturingbioresorbable implantsbone defect treatmentcomputer-aided designMg-based scaffoldsregenerative medicinetissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID36500191
PMCPMC9739563
OpenAlexW4311292358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.