Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36500118›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022

The Use of Various Measurement Methods for Estimating the Fracture Energy of PLA (Polylactic Acid).

Luyao Gao, Aleksey D Drozdov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Luyao GaoDepartment of Materials and Production, Aalborg University, Pontoppidanstræde 103, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4022-8977
Aleksey D DrozdovDepartment of Materials and Production, Aalborg University, Pontoppidanstræde 103, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6049-5813

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The essential work of fracture (EWF) and Izod/Charpy impact tests have been used to investigate the fracture toughness in the plane stress of brittle polymers. In this paper, we had three goals: first, we aimed to employ how to estimate PLA toughness in different geometries; then, we proposed to compare Izod and Charpy Impact toughness in the same geometry; finally, we intended to determine the difference between EWF toughness and dynamic toughness. The results showed that the EWF method could be applied to evaluate PLA fracture behavior with small ligaments (2-4 mm), while the dynamic test could be employed with larger ligaments (5-7 mm). A comparison of the two impact test results obtained the following conclusions: Charpy impact toughness was higher than Izod impact toughness in the same geometry, and the impact toughness under a notch angle of 90° was larger than that of an angle of 45°. Both EWF and dynamic tests can be used to explore PLA toughness with small ligaments. The fracture energy decreases with ligament size in the EWF test, but it increases in the dynamic test.

Indexed as

dynamic fractureessential work of fracturePLAPLA toughness

Identifiers

PMID36500118
PMCPMC9740795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.