ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Quality Quantification and Control via Novel Self-Growing Process-Quality Model of Parts Fabricated by LPBF Process.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Wind Speed Prediction Based on Error Compensation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Programmable Thermo-Responsive Self-Morphing Structures Design and Performance.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) presents a more extensive allowable design complexity and manufacturability compared with the traditional manufacturing processes by depositing materials in a layer-wised manner. However, the process variability in the LPBF process induces quality uncertainty and inconsistency. Specifically, the mechanical properties, e.g., tensile strength, are hard to be predicted and controlled in the LPBF process. Much research has recently been reported exploring the qualitative influence of single/two process parameters on tensile strength. In fact, mechanical properties are comprehensively affected by multiple correlated process parameters with unclear and complex interactions. Thus, the study on the quantitative process-quality model of the metal LPBF process is urgently needed to provide an enough-strength component via the metal LPBF process. Recent progress in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) provides new insight into quality prediction in terms of computational accuracy and speed. However, the predictive model quality through the traditional AL/ML is heavily determined by the training data size, and the experimental analysis can be expansive on LPBF. This paper explores the comprehensive effect of the tensile strength of 316L stainless-steel parts on LPBF and proposes a valid quantitative predictive model through a novel self-growing machine-learning framework. The self-growing framework can autonomously expand and classify the growing dataset to provide a high-accuracy prediction with fewer input data. To verify this predictive model of tensile strength, specimens manufactured by the LPBF process with different group process parameters (laser power, scanning speed, and hatch spacing) are collected. The experimental results validate the predicted tensile strengths within a less than 3% deviation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.