Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36500016›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Quality Quantification and Control via Novel Self-Growing Process-Quality Model of Parts Fabricated by LPBF Process.

Xinyi Xiao, Beibei Chu, Zhengyan Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Wind Speed Prediction Based on Error Compensation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xinyi XiaoMechanical and Manufacturing Engineering Department, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA.
Beibei ChuSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300130, China.
Zhengyan ZhangSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300130, China.

Funding

Central government to guide local scientific and technological development of Hebei Province 226Z1903GNational Natural Science Foundation of China 61802108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) presents a more extensive allowable design complexity and manufacturability compared with the traditional manufacturing processes by depositing materials in a layer-wised manner. However, the process variability in the LPBF process induces quality uncertainty and inconsistency. Specifically, the mechanical properties, e.g., tensile strength, are hard to be predicted and controlled in the LPBF process. Much research has recently been reported exploring the qualitative influence of single/two process parameters on tensile strength. In fact, mechanical properties are comprehensively affected by multiple correlated process parameters with unclear and complex interactions. Thus, the study on the quantitative process-quality model of the metal LPBF process is urgently needed to provide an enough-strength component via the metal LPBF process. Recent progress in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) provides new insight into quality prediction in terms of computational accuracy and speed. However, the predictive model quality through the traditional AL/ML is heavily determined by the training data size, and the experimental analysis can be expansive on LPBF. This paper explores the comprehensive effect of the tensile strength of 316L stainless-steel parts on LPBF and proposes a valid quantitative predictive model through a novel self-growing machine-learning framework. The self-growing framework can autonomously expand and classify the growing dataset to provide a high-accuracy prediction with fewer input data. To verify this predictive model of tensile strength, specimens manufactured by the LPBF process with different group process parameters (laser power, scanning speed, and hatch spacing) are collected. The experimental results validate the predicted tensile strengths within a less than 3% deviation.

Indexed as

316L stainless-steelLPBFmachine learningprocess-quality modelself-growingtensile strength

Identifiers

PMID36500016
PMCPMC9736372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.