Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36500010›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Chromate-Free Corrosion Protection Strategies for Magnesium Alloys-A Review: Part II-PEO and Anodizing.

Ewa Wierzbicka, Bahram Vaghefinazari, Marta Mohedano, Peter Visser, Ralf Posner, Carsten Blawert, Mikhail Zheludkevich, Sviatlana Lamaka, Endzhe Matykina, Raúl Arrabal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ewa WierzbickaDepartamento de Ingeniería Química y de Materiales, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8064-4823
Bahram VaghefinazariInstitute of Surface Science, Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon, 21502 Geesthacht, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5035-6476
Marta MohedanoDepartamento de Ingeniería Química y de Materiales, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9318-3031
Peter VisserAkzoNobel, 2171 EN Sassenheim, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6388-382X
Ralf PosnerHenkel AG & Co. KGaA, 40191 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Carsten BlawertInstitute of Surface Science, Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon, 21502 Geesthacht, Germany.
Mikhail ZheludkevichInstitute of Surface Science, Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon, 21502 Geesthacht, Germany.
Sviatlana LamakaInstitute of Surface Science, Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon, 21502 Geesthacht, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0349-0899
Endzhe MatykinaDepartamento de Ingeniería Química y de Materiales, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Raúl ArrabalDepartamento de Ingeniería Química y de Materiales, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7649-4049

Funding

European Commission 755515MCIU/AEI/FEDER, UE PID2021-124341OB-C22Regional Government of Madrid and EU Structural and Social Funds S2018/NMT-4411
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although hexavalent chromium-based protection systems are effective and their long-term performance is well understood, they can no longer be used due to their proven Cr(VI) toxicity and carcinogenic effect. The search for alternative protection technologies for Mg alloys has been going on for at least a couple of decades. However, surface treatment systems with equivalent efficacies to that of Cr(VI)-based ones have only begun to emerge much more recently. It is still proving challenging to find sufficiently protective replacements for Cr(VI) that do not give rise to safety concerns related to corrosion, especially in terms of fulfilling the requirements of the transportation industry. Additionally, in overcoming these obstacles, the advantages of newly introduced technologies have to include not only health safety but also need to be balanced against their added cost, as well as being environmentally friendly and simple to implement and maintain. Anodizing, especially when carried out above the breakdown potential (technology known as Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation (PEO)) is an electrochemical oxidation process which has been recognized as one of the most effective methods to significantly improve the corrosion resistance of Mg and its alloys by forming a protective ceramic-like layer on their surface that isolates the base material from aggressive environmental agents. Part II of this review summarizes developments in and future outlooks for Mg anodizing, including traditional chromium-based processes and newly developed chromium-free alternatives, such as PEO technology and the use of organic electrolytes. This work provides an overview of processing parameters such as electrolyte composition and additives, voltage/current regimes, and post-treatment sealing strategies that influence the corrosion performance of the coatings. This large variability of the fabrication conditions makes it possible to obtain Cr-free products that meet the industrial requirements for performance, as expected from traditional Cr-based technologies.

Indexed as

coatingCr(VI)-based coatingsmagnesiummicro-arc oxidation (MAO)

Identifiers

PMID36500010
PMCPMC9737229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.