ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Using Iron Tailings for Phosphate Removal in Cemented Phosphogypsum (PG) Backfill.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Study on the occurrence state of main components of phosphogypsum dihydrate and its impurity distribution.RSC advances · 2024Article
- Efficient Adsorption Removal of Phosphate from Rural Domestic Sewage by Waste Eggshell-Modified Peanut Shell Biochar Adsorbent Materials.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Compared with the post-treatment of pollutants, such as the removal of phosphate from wastewater, it is more important to develop effective emission control strategies to reduce phosphate pollution. Phosphogypsum (PG) is a typical solid waste byproduct of phosphate production and contains high amounts of residual phosphate. In order to control the phosphate emissions during the recycling of PG aggregates for cemented backfill, another solid waste product—iron tailings (ITs)—was added during the preparation of backfill slurry. The results showed that the ITs effectively accelerated the phosphate removal in cemented PG backfill, enabling the quick reduction in the phosphate concentration to the discharge standard (<0.5 mg/L) within 15 min. This means that the emissions of phosphate to bleeding water were effectively controlled. The adsorption experiment showed that phosphate was adsorbed by the ITs, and the adsorption data fitted well with the Langmuir adsorption model (R2 = 0.98) and pseudo-second-order kinetic model (R2 = 0.99), indicating that the phosphate adsorption of ITs was a monolayer chemical adsorption. Furthermore, an unconfined compressive strength (UCS) test was performed on the backfill with the addition of ITs. Compared to the control group (without ITs), the UCS of backfill with 20% ITs increased from 1.08 MPa to 1.33 MPa, indicating that the addition of solid waste could be beneficial to the strength development of the backfill by mitigating the interference of phosphate with the hydration process. The backfill cured for 28 d was selected for the toxic leaching test, and the phosphate concentration in the leachates was always below 0.02 mg/L, indicating that ITs can effectively immobilize phosphate in backfill for a long time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.