Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36499425›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Trigeminal Sensory Supply Is Essential for Motor Recovery after Facial Nerve Injury.

Svenja Rink-Notzon, Jannika Reuscher, Klaus Nohroudi, Marilena Manthou, Tessa Gordon, Doychin N Angelov

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. From fracture-related injury to surgically modifiable risk: a trauma-focused bibliometric analysis of craniofacial nerve injuries.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2026
    Article
  2. [Clinical analysis of transcranial facial nerve bridging with interpositional graft for the treatment of facial nerve injury].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Svenja Rink-NotzonDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dental and Oral Medicine, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1045-9320
Jannika ReuscherAnatomical Institute II, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany.
Klaus NohroudiAnatomical Institute I, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany.
Marilena ManthouDepartment of Histology and Embryology, Aristotle University Thessaloniki, GR-541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-7075-878X
Tessa GordonDepartment of Surgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada.
Doychin N AngelovAnatomical Institute II, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1436-9119
University of Cologne · DEAristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRHospital for Sick Children · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recovery of mimic function after facial nerve transection is poor. The successful regrowth of regenerating motor nerve fibers to reinnervate their targets is compromised by (i) poor axonal navigation and excessive collateral branching, (ii) abnormal exchange of nerve impulses between adjacent regrowing axons, namely axonal crosstalk, and (iii) insufficient synaptic input to the axotomized facial motoneurons. As a result, axotomized motoneurons become hyperexcitable but unable to discharge. We review our findings, which have addressed the poor return of mimic function after facial nerve injuries, by testing the hypothesized detrimental component, and we propose that intensifying the trigeminal sensory input to axotomized and electrophysiologically silent facial motoneurons improves the specificity of the reinnervation of appropriate targets. We compared behavioral, functional, and morphological parameters after single reconstructive surgery of the facial nerve (or its buccal branch) with those obtained after identical facial nerve surgery, but combined with direct or indirect stimulation of the ipsilateral infraorbital nerve. We found that both methods of trigeminal sensory stimulation, i.e., stimulation of the vibrissal hairs and manual stimulation of the whisker pad, were beneficial for the outcome through improvement of the quality of target reinnervation and recovery of vibrissal motor performance.

Indexed as

Facial Nerve InjuriesAnimalsFacial NerveNerve RegenerationRatsRats, WistarRecovery of FunctionVibrissaeaxotomyfacial nervemorphological correlationmotion analysismotoneuronratrecovery of functionstimulationtrigeminal nervevibrissal whisking

Identifiers

PMID36499425
PMCPMC9740813
OpenAlexW4310525616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.