Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36499277›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Salvage Chemotherapy with Cisplatin, Ifosfamide, and Paclitaxel in Aggressive Variant of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Gunhild von Amsberg, Mirjam Zilles, Wael Mansour, Philipp Gild, Winfried Alsdorf, Moritz Kaune, Lukas Böckelmann, Jessica Hauschild, Christoph Krisp, Tina Rohlfing and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gunhild von AmsbergDepartment of Oncology, University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Mirjam ZillesDepartment of Oncology, University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Wael MansourDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0641-2885
Philipp GildDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Winfried AlsdorfDepartment of Oncology, University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Moritz KauneDepartment of Oncology, University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Lukas BöckelmannDepartment of Oncology, University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0851-7480
Jessica HauschildDepartment of Oncology, University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Christoph KrispInstitute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Section Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Tina RohlfingDepartment of Oncology, University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Ceren SaygiBioinformatics Core, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Malik AlawiBioinformatics Core, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Alexandra ZielinskiDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Claudia LangebrakePharmacy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Su Jung Oh-HohenhorstMartini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4483-3499
Sven PernerInstitute of Pathology, University of Lübeck and University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.
Derya TilkiMartini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7033-1380
Hartmut SchlüterInstitute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Section Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9358-7036
Markus GraefenMartini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Sergey A DyshlovoyDepartment of Oncology, University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7155-9245
Carsten BokemeyerDepartment of Oncology, University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Universität Hamburg · DEUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft INST 152/837-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft INST 337/15-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft INST 337/16-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significant progress has been achieved in the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, results in patients with aggressive variant prostate cancer (AVPC) have been disappointing. Here, we report retrospectively collected data from intensively pretreated AVPC patients (n = 17; 88.2% visceral metastases; 82% elevation of neuroendocrine markers) treated with salvage chemotherapy consisting of cisplatin, ifosfamide, and paclitaxel (TIP). At the interim analysis, 60% of patients showed radiographic response or stable disease (PFS = 2.5 months; OS = 6 months). In men who responded to chemotherapy, an OS > 15 months was observed. Preclinical analyses confirmed the high activity of the TIP regimen, especially in docetaxel-resistant prostate cancer cells. This effect was primarily mediated by increased cisplatin sensitivity in the emergence of taxane resistance. Proteomic and functional analyses identified a lower DNA repair capacity and cell cycle machinery deficiency to be causative. In contrast, paclitaxel showed inconsistent effects, partially antagonizing cisplatin and ifosfamide in some AVPC models. Consequently, paclitaxel has been excluded from the TIP combination for future patients. In summary, we report for the first time the promising efficacy of TIP as salvage therapy in AVPC. Our preclinical data indicate a pivotal role for cisplatin in overcoming docetaxel resistance.

Indexed as

PaclitaxelProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCisplatinDocetaxelHumansMaleProteomicsRetrospective StudiesSalvage TherapyTreatment OutcomeCisplatinDocetaxelPaclitaxelaggressive variant of prostate cancercisplatinDDR alterationDNA damageifosfamidemetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancerpaclitaxelTIP combinational therapy

Identifiers

PMID36499277
PMCPMC9738104
OpenAlexW4310995124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.