ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022
Review on Magnetism in Catalysis: From Theory to PEMFC Applications of
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Magnetic Moments in Single-Atom Alloys: Trends, Mechanisms, and Implications for Tunable Adsorption.ACS physical chemistry Au · 2026Article
- High-Spin Pt Sites of Intermetallic Compound via Pinning Effect Boost Oxygen Reduction Performance.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026Article
- Spin Engineering of Dual-Atom Site Catalysts for Efficient Electrochemical Energy Conversion.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Review
- Modeling Heterogeneous Catalysis Using Quantum Computers: An Academic and Industry Perspective.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Review
- Improved Catalyst Performance for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction under a Chiral Bias.ACS catalysis · 2024Article
- Magnetoelectrocatalysis: Evidence from the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction.ACS physical chemistry Au · 2024Article
- Chiral Induced Spin Selectivity.Chemical reviews · 2024Review
- Experimental Evidences on Magnetism-Covalent Bonding Interplay in Structural Properties of Solids and during Chemisorption.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Self-Standing Pd-Based Nanostructures for Electrocatalytic CO Oxidation: Do Nanocatalyst Shape and Electrolyte pH Matter?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The relationship between magnetism and catalysis has been an important topic since the mid-20th century. At present time, the scientific community is well aware that a full comprehension of this relationship is required to face modern challenges, such as the need for clean energy technology. The successful use of (para-)magnetic materials has already been corroborated in catalytic processes, such as hydrogenation, Fenton reaction and ammonia synthesis. These catalysts typically contain transition metals from the first to the third row and are affected by the presence of an external magnetic field. Nowadays, it appears that the most promising approach to reach the goal of a more sustainable future is via ferromagnetic conducting catalysts containing open-shell metals (i.e., Fe, Co and Ni) with extra stabilization coming from the presence of an external magnetic field. However, understanding how intrinsic and extrinsic magnetic features are related to catalysis is still a complex task, especially when catalytic performances are improved by these magnetic phenomena. In the present review, we introduce the relationship between magnetism and catalysis and outline its importance in the production of clean energy, by describing the representative case of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.