Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36499046›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Testing of Exchange-Correlation Functionals of DFT for a Reliable Description of the Electron Density Distribution in Organic Molecules.

Małgorzata Domagała, Mirosław Jabłoński, Alina T Dubis, Manfred Zabel, Arno Pfitzner, Marcin Palusiak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Chemical neighborhood exploration for substrate discovery in biocatalysis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Prediction ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Halogen Bond to Experimentally Significant N-Heterocyclic Carbenes (I, IMeInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Małgorzata DomagałaFaculty of Chemistry, University of Lodz, Pomorska 163/165, 90-236 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0077-7728
Mirosław JabłońskiFaculty of Chemistry, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Gagarina 7, 87-100 Toruń, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6455-051X
Alina T DubisFaculty of Chemistry, University of Białystok, Ciołkowskiego 1K, 15-245 Białystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2594-8386
Manfred ZabelInstitute of Inorganic Chemistry, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstr. 31, 93040 Regensburg, Germany.
Arno PfitznerInstitute of Inorganic Chemistry, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstr. 31, 93040 Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8653-7439
Marcin PalusiakFaculty of Chemistry, University of Lodz, Pomorska 163/165, 90-236 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0032-0878

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Researchers carrying out calculations using the DFT method face the problem of the correct choice of the exchange-correlation functional to describe the quantities they are interested in. This article deals with benchmark calculations aimed at testing various exchange-correlation functionals in terms of a reliable description of the electron density distribution in molecules. For this purpose, 30 functionals representing all rungs of Jacob's Ladder are selected and then the values of some QTAIM-based parameters are compared with their reference equivalents obtained at the CCSD/aug-cc-pVTZ level of theory. The presented results show that the DFT method undoubtedly has the greatest problems with a reliable description of the electron density distribution in multiple strongly polar bonds, such as C=O, and bonds associated with large electron charge delocalization. The performance of the tested functionals turned out to be unsystematic. Nevertheless, in terms of a reliable general description of QTAIM-based parameters, the M11, SVWN, BHHLYP, M06-HF, and, to a slightly lesser extent, also BLYP, B3LYP, and X3LYP functionals turned out to be the worst. It is alarming to find the most popular B3LYP functional in this group. On the other hand, in the case of the electron density at the bond critical point, being the most important QTAIM-based parameter, the M06-HF functional is especially discouraged due to the very poor description of the C=O bond. On the contrary, the VSXC, M06-L, SOGGA11-X, M06-2X, MN12-SX, and, to a slightly lesser extent, also TPSS, TPSSh, and B1B95 perform well in this respect. Particularly noteworthy is the overwhelming performance of double hybrids in terms of reliable values of bond delocalization indices. The results show that there is no clear improvement in the reliability of describing the electron density distribution with climbing Jacob's Ladder, as top-ranked double hybrids are also, in some cases, able to produce poor values compared to CCSD.

Indexed as

ElectronsReproducibility of ResultsbenchmarkDFTelectron densityexchange-correlation functionalJacob’s LadderQTAIM

Identifiers

PMID36499046
PMCPMC9740346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.