Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36499011›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Constipation Mitigation by Rhubarb Extract in Middle-Aged Adults Is Linked to Gut Microbiome Modulation: A Double-Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Audrey M Neyrinck, Julie Rodriguez, Bernard Taminiau, Florent Herpin, Patrice D Cani, Georges Daube, Laure B Bindels, Nathalie M Delzenne

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Audrey M NeyrinckMetabolism and Nutrition Research Group, Louvain Drug Research Institute, UCLouvain, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9435-3338
Julie RodriguezMetabolism and Nutrition Research Group, Louvain Drug Research Institute, UCLouvain, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium.
Bernard TaminiauFundamental and Applied Research for Animal and Health (FARAH), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6456-329X
Florent HerpinCEN Nutriment, Groupe CEN, 21000 Dijon, France.
Patrice D CaniMetabolism and Nutrition Research Group, Louvain Drug Research Institute, UCLouvain, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2040-2448
Georges DaubeFundamental and Applied Research for Animal and Health (FARAH), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9282-8408
Laure B BindelsMetabolism and Nutrition Research Group, Louvain Drug Research Institute, UCLouvain, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-3747-3234
Nathalie M DelzenneMetabolism and Nutrition Research Group, Louvain Drug Research Institute, UCLouvain, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2115-6082
UCLouvain · BEUniversity of Liège · BEWalloon Excellence in Lifesciences and Biotechnology · BE

Funding

Service Public de Wallonie 6918
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gut microbiota alterations are intimately linked to chronic constipation upon aging. We investigated the role of targeted changes in the gut microbiota composition in the relief of constipation symptoms after rhubarb extract (RE) supplementation in middle-aged volunteers. Subjects (95% women, average 58 years old) were randomized to three groups treated with RE at two different doses determined by its content of rhein (supplementation of 12.5 mg and 25 mg per day) vs. placebo (maltodextrin) for 30 days. We demonstrated that daily oral supplementation of RE for 30 days was safe even at the higher dose. Stool frequency and consistency, and perceived change in transit problem, transit speed and difficulty in evacuating, investigated by validated questionnaires, were improved in both groups of RE-treated volunteers compared to placebo. Higher abundance of

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeRheumAdultConstipationDouble-Blind MethodEubacterialesFatty Acids, VolatileFecesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedFatty Acids, Volatilebutyrate-producing bacteriaconstipationLachnospiraceaemicrobiotamiddle-agedrhubarb

Identifiers

PMID36499011
PMCPMC9738964
OpenAlexW4309934961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.