ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022
3D Printing in Regenerative Medicine: Technologies and Resources Utilized.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
64 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Impact of Biomaterial Charge on Cells' Bioelectrical Signaling.Cells, tissues, organs · 2026Review
- Bioprinting in Tissue Repair and Its ENT Applications.Polymers · 2026Review
- The Role of 3D Printing in Regenerative Medicine: A Game-Changer in Tissue Engineering.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- A Formal Optimization-Oriented Design Framework for Predictive Extrusion-Based 3D Bioprinting.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Revolutionizing Antibiotic Delivery: Harnessing 3D-Printing Technology to Combat Bacterial Resistance.Current pharmaceutical design · 2026Review
- Optimizing mandibular bone defect reconstruction using adipose-derived stem cells on 3-dimensionally printed polycaprolactone/xenograft scaffolds in canine model.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Review
- Article
- Integrating 3D Printing with Injection Molding for Improved Manufacturing Efficiency.Polymers · 2025Article
- Enhancing Tensile Performance of Cemented Tailings Backfill Through 3D-Printed Polymer Lattices: Mechanical Properties and Microstructural Investigation.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Biomimetic Additive Manufacturing: Engineering Complexity Inspired by Nature's Simplicity.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Modeling the Bone Marrow Niche in Multiple Myeloma: From 2D Cultures to 3D Systems.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- 3D bioprinting technology innovation in female reproductive system.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Optimization of LCD-Based 3D Printing for the Development of Clotrimazole-Coated Microneedle Systems.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Evaluation of High-Temperature Sterilization Processes: Their Influence on the Mechanical Integrity of Additively Manufactured Polymeric Biomaterials.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Evolution of Thermoplastic Raw Materials in High-Speed FFF/FDM 3D Printing Era: Challenges and Opportunities.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Novel Soft Dosage Forms for Paediatric Applications: Can We 3D-Print Them or Not?Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The Properties and Applicability of Bioprinting in the Field of Maxillofacial Surgery.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- From Stents to Smart Implants Employing Biomimetic Materials: The Impact of 4D Printing on Modern Healthcare.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Evaluating the Educational Impact of 3D-Printed Models in Cervical Laminoplasty Training: A Survey-Based Study.Cureus · 2025Article
4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past ten years, the use of additive manufacturing techniques, also known as "3D printing", has steadily increased in a variety of scientific fields. There are a number of inherent advantages to these fabrication methods over conventional manufacturing due to the way that they work, which is based on the layer-by-layer material-deposition principle. These benefits include the accurate attribution of complex, pre-designed shapes, as well as the use of a variety of innovative raw materials. Its main advantage is the ability to fabricate custom shapes with an interior lattice network connecting them and a porous surface that traditional manufacturing techniques cannot adequately attribute. Such structures are being used for direct implantation into the human body in the biomedical field in areas such as bio-printing, where this potential is being heavily utilized. The fabricated items must be made of biomaterials with the proper mechanical properties, as well as biomaterials that exhibit characteristics such as biocompatibility, bioresorbability, and biodegradability, in order to meet the strict requirements that such procedures impose. The most significant biomaterials used in these techniques are listed in this work, but their advantages and disadvantages are also discussed in relation to the aforementioned properties that are crucial to their use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.