Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36498890›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Joining Forces for Cancer Treatment: From "TCR versus CAR" to "TCR and CAR".

Karin Teppert, Xueting Wang, Kathleen Anders, César Evaristo, Dominik Lock, Annette Künkele

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Novel Therapeutic Development for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karin TeppertMiltenyi Biotec B.V. & Co. KG, 51429 Bergisch Gladbach, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2645-6781
Xueting WangMiltenyi Biotec B.V. & Co. KG, 51429 Bergisch Gladbach, Germany.
Kathleen AndersGerman Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 10117 Berlin, Germany.
César EvaristoMiltenyi Biotec B.V. & Co. KG, 51429 Bergisch Gladbach, Germany.
Dominik LockMiltenyi Biotec B.V. & Co. KG, 51429 Bergisch Gladbach, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3056-4582
Annette KünkeleGerman Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 10117 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8406-5412
Miltenyi Biotec (Germany) · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

T cell-based immunotherapy has demonstrated great therapeutic potential in recent decades, on the one hand, by using tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and, on the other hand, by engineering T cells to obtain anti-tumor specificities through the introduction of either engineered T cell receptors (TCRs) or chimeric antigen receptors (CARs). Given the distinct design of both receptors and the type of antigen that is encountered, the requirements for proper antigen engagement and downstream signal transduction by TCRs and CARs differ. Synapse formation and signal transduction of CAR T cells, despite further refinement of CAR T cell designs, still do not fully recapitulate that of TCR T cells and might limit CAR T cell persistence and functionality. Thus, deep knowledge about the molecular differences in CAR and TCR T cell signaling would greatly advance the further optimization of CAR designs and elucidate under which circumstances a combination of both receptors would improve the functionality of T cells for cancer treatment. Herein, we provide a comprehensive review about similarities and differences by directly comparing the architecture, synapse formation and signaling of TCRs and CARs, highlighting the knowns and unknowns. In the second part of the review, we discuss the current status of combining CAR and TCR technologies, encouraging a change in perspective from "TCR versus CAR" to "TCR and CAR".

Indexed as

NeoplasmsReceptors, Chimeric AntigenHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveReceptors, Antigen, T-CellT-LymphocytesReceptors, Antigen, T-CellReceptors, Chimeric Antigenadoptive T cell therapieschimeric antigen receptorendosomal traffickingimmune synapseimmunotherapysignalingT cell engineeringT cell receptortumor immunology

Identifiers

PMID36498890
PMCPMC9739809
OpenAlexW4309714904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.