ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022
Role of Biomarkers in the Management of Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epigenetics and In Silico Transcriptome Analysis of Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia.European journal of haematology · 2026Review
- Molecular, Cytogenetic, and Immunophenotypic Biomarkers in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Current Evidence and Future Directions-A Narrative Review.Health science reports · 2026Article
- A plasma-based DNA test for quantification of disease burden in acute myeloid leukemia patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- A plasma-based DNA test for quantification of disease burden in acute myeloid leukemia patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Bone marrow plasma cytokine composition indicates acute myeloid leukemia progression and treatment response.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
- Schlafen 12 Modulation and Targeting in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Cancer research communications · 2025Article
- Patient and Healthcare Professional Reflections on Consenting for Extra Bone Marrow Samples to a Biobank for Research-A Qualitative Study.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- The clinical utility and prognostic value of next-generation sequencing for measurable residual disease assessment in acute myeloid leukemia.Therapeutic advances in hematology · 2025Article
- A Combinatorial Functional Precision Medicine Platform for Rapid Therapeutic Response Prediction in AML.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Identification of two key biomarkers CD93 and FGL2 associated with survival of acute myeloid leukaemia by weighted gene co-expression network analysis.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2024Article
- Pan-cancer analysis of DDIT4 identifying its prognostic value and function in acute myeloid leukemia.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Article
- Cancer Biomarkers and Precision Oncology: A Review of Recent Trends and Innovations.Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2024Review
- Transcriptional Response to Standard AML Drugs Identifies Synergistic Combinations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Effective Prognostic Model for Therapy Response Prediction in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite many recent advances in treatment options, acute myeloid leukemia (AML) still has a high mortality rate. One important issue in optimizing outcomes for AML patients lies in the limited ability to predict response to specific therapies, duration of response, and likelihood of relapse. With evolving genetic characterization and improving molecular definitions, the ability to predict outcomes and long-term prognosis is slowly improving. The majority of the currently used prognostic assessments relate to molecular and chromosomal abnormalities, as well as response to initial therapy. These risk categories, however, do not account for a large amount of the variability in AML. Laboratory techniques now utilized in the clinic extend beyond bone marrow morphology and single gene sequencing, to next-generation sequencing of large gene panels and multiparameter flow cytometry, among others. Other technologic advances, such as gene expression analysis, have yet to demonstrate enough predictive and prognostic power to be employed in clinical medicine outside of clinical trials, but may be incorporated into the clinic in the future. In this review, we discuss the utility of current biomarkers, and present novel biomarker techniques and strategies that are in development for AML patients. Measurable residual disease (MRD) is a powerful prognostic tool that is increasingly being incorporated into clinical practice, and there are some exciting emerging biomarker technologies that have the potential to improve prognostic power in AML. As AML continues to be a difficult-to-treat disease with poor outcomes in many subtypes, advances in biomarkers that lead to better treatment decisions are greatly needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.