Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36498817›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022

Pressure Pain Threshold of the Upper Trapezius Trigger Point: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Baseline Values and Their Modification after Physical Therapy.

Tommaso Geri, Alice Botticchio, Giacomo Rossettini, Sanaz Pournajaf, Leonardo Pellicciari, Stefano Di Antonio, Matteo Castaldo

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Acupoint Sensitivity in Health and Disease: A Systematic Review.Journal of integrative and complementary medicine · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Tommaso GeriIndependent Researcher, 51100 Pistoia, Italy.
Alice BotticchioIndependent Researcher, 25121 Brescia, Italy.
Giacomo RossettiniSchool of Physiotherapy, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1623-7681
Sanaz PournajafNeurorehabilitation Research Laboratory, Department of Neurological and Rehabilitation Sciences, IRCCS San Raffaele Roma, 00163 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8749-2236
Leonardo PellicciariIRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9521-3759
Stefano Di AntonioCenter for Pain and Neuroplasticity (CNAP), Department of Health Science and Technology, School of Medicine, Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2172-6738
Matteo CastaldoCenter for Pain and Neuroplasticity (CNAP), Department of Health Science and Technology, School of Medicine, Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2427-720X
Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITIstituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna · ITUniversity of Brescia · ITUniversity of Siena · ITUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

Ministero della Salute Ricerca Corrente
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMyofascial trigger points (TrP) are diagnosed upon the presence of clinical signs among which hypersensitivity is considered one of the most important. The detection of the pressure pain threshold (PPT) is used to quantify the degree of hypersensitivity. However, there is a lack of normative data about how hypersensitive a TrP is. Therefore, the objective was to quantify the PPT for myofascial TrP in the upper trapezius muscle and its modification after manual or instrumental physical therapy interventions.

methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted among three databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and PEDro). Two independent reviewers conducted the electronic search and assessed the methodological quality of the included studies.

resultsEleven studies with a high-risk bias indicated that the PPT at TrP sites was 105.11 kPa lower (95% CI: -148.93; -61.28) at active TrP sites (Chi-squared = 1.07, df = 1 (

conclusionsThe results of the present study show that TrP has a decreased PPT when compared to healthy muscles and that physical therapy may increase the PPT. However, the clinical relevance of this decreased PPT needs to be further elucidated. Further, the high risk of bias in all the retrieved studies undermines the validity of the results.

Indexed as

physical therapies modalitiesrehabilitationtrigger points

Identifiers

PMID36498817
PMCPMC9739431
OpenAlexW4311281309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.