Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36498793›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Early Mortality Risk in Acute Trauma Patients: Predictive Value of Injury Severity Score, Trauma Index, and Different Types of Shock Indices.

Guoyang Dai, Xin Lu, Feng Xu, Deli Xu, Pengfei Li, Xionghui Chen, Fengbao Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The effectiveness of shock indices on prognosis in burn patients admitted to the emergency department.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Guoyang DaiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215000, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5278-659X
Xin LuDepartment of Emergency Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215000, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9692-4886
Feng XuDepartment of Emergency Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215000, China.
Deli XuDepartment of Emergency Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215000, China.
Pengfei LiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215000, China.
Xionghui ChenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215000, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4866-0951
Fengbao GuoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215000, China.

Funding

Jiangsu Provincial Hospital Association Hospital Management Innovation Special Research Project JSYGY-3-2021-JZ71
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to explore the predictive value of the Injury Severity Score (ISS), Trauma Index (TI) and different types of shock indices (SI) on the early mortality risk of acute trauma patients. Methods: Clinical data of acute trauma patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria of this study and were treated in the hospital from January 2020 to December 2020 were retrospectively collected, including gender, age, trauma mechanism, severe injury site, ISS, TI, admission vital signs, different types of shock indices (SI), death within 7 days, length of hospital stay, and Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS). The predictive value of the Injury Severity Score, Trauma Index, and different types of shock indices on the risk of early mortality in patients with acute trauma were compared using relevant statistical methods. Results: A total of 283 acute trauma patients (mean age 54.0 ± 17.9 years, 30.74% female) were included, and 43 (15.19%) of the patients died during 7 days of hospitalization. The admission ISS, TI, SI, MSI, and ASI in the survival group were significantly lower than those in the death group, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Meanwhile, different trauma assessment tools included in the study have certain predictive value for early mortality risk of trauma patients. Conclusions: The TI indicates a better capability to predict the risk of early death in patients with acute trauma. As the most sensitive predictor, the SI has the greatest reference value in predicting the risk of early death in patients with traumatic shock.

Indexed as

injury severity scoremortality riskshock indextraumatrauma index

Identifiers

PMID36498793
PMCPMC9735436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.