Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36498737›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

The Development of a Gleason Score-Related Gene Signature for Predicting the Prognosis of Prostate Cancer.

Yiliyasi Yimamu, Xu Yang, Junxin Chen, Cheng Luo, Wenyang Xiao, Hongyu Guan, Daohu Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yiliyasi YimamuDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9071-8849
Xu YangDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Junxin ChenDepartment of Endocrinology and Diabetes Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8083-8588
Cheng LuoDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Wenyang XiaoDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Hongyu GuanDepartment of Endocrinology and Diabetes Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Daohu WangDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recurrence of prostate cancer (PCa) is intrinsically linked to increased mortality. The goal of this study was to develop an efficient and reliable prognosis prediction signature for PCa patients. The training cohort was acquired from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset, while the validation cohort was obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) dataset (GSE70769). To explore the Gleason score (GS)-based prediction signature, we screened the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between low- and high-GS groups, and then univariate Cox regression survival analysis and multiple Cox analyses were performed sequentially using the training cohort. The testing cohort was used to evaluate and validate the prognostic model's effectiveness, accuracy, and clinical practicability. In addition, the correlation analyses between the risk score and clinical features, as well as immune infiltration, were performed. We constructed and optimized a valid and credible model for predicting the prognosis of PCa recurrence using four GS-associated genes (SFRP4, FEV, COL1A1, SULF1). Furthermore, ROC and Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a higher predictive efficiency for biochemical recurrence (BCR). The results showed that the risk model was an independent prognostic factor. Moreover, the risk score was associated with clinical features and immune infiltration. Finally, the risk model was validated in a testing cohort. Our data support that the GS-based four-gene signature acts as a novel signature for predicting BCR in PCa patients.

Indexed as

biochemical recurrencegene signatureGleason scoreprostate cancerradical prostatectomyrisk score

Identifiers

PMID36498737
PMCPMC9737657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.