Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36498685›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Could Short Stems THA Be a Good Bone-Saving Option Even in Obese Patients?

Michela Saracco, Andrea Fidanza, Stefano Necozione, Giulio Maccauro, Giandomenico Logroscino

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with BMI ≥ 30 kg/mJournal of personalized medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michela Saracco"A. Gemelli" IRCCS University Hospital Foundation, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2190-9574
Andrea FidanzaDepartment Life, Health and Environmental Sciences-Mininvasive Orthopaedic Surgery, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.
Stefano NecozioneDepartment Life, Health and Environmental Sciences-Unit of Epidemiolody, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2501-1665
Giulio Maccauro"A. Gemelli" IRCCS University Hospital Foundation, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Giandomenico LogroscinoDepartment Life, Health and Environmental Sciences-Mininvasive Orthopaedic Surgery, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.
University of L'Aquila · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Short femoral stems, with preservation of the femoral bone stock, are commonly used in recent years for hip replacement in younger and more active patients. Obesity is increasingly spreading even in the younger population. The aim of this case-series study is to evaluate short stems compared to traditional hip prostheses in the obese population. A total of 77 consecutive patients with a BMI greater than or equal to 30 Kg/m2 were enrolled in this prospective study and were divided into two groups: 49 patients have been implanted with short stems while 28 patients were implanted with traditional stems. All the patients were treated for primary osteoarthritis or avascular necrosis and all the stems were implanted by the same surgeon using a posterior approach. Clinical (Harris Hip Score—HHS, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index—WOMAC, visual analogue scale—VAS, 12-item Short Form Health Survey—SF-12) and radiographic outcomes were recorded. Radiological evaluations were carried out by three different blinded surgeons. A statistical analysis was performed (chi-square, t-test, Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test, 2-factor ANOVA). At a mean follow-up of 42.6 months both groups showed a marked improvement in pain and in the clinical scores between pre- and post-surgical procedures (p < 0.05) with no significant differences between the two groups at last follow-up (p > 0.05). The radiological evaluations, with high concordance correlation between the three blinded surgeons (ICC consistently >0.80), showed good positioning and osseointegration in all cases, with no significant differences in the restoration of the joint geometry and complications. No revisions were recorded during the follow-up period. In conclusion, short stems appear to be a good option for bone preservation even in obese patients, showing comparable results to traditional implants.

Indexed as

mini-invasive THAobesityosteoarthritisshort stemsstemless hip prosthesesTHAtotal hip arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID36498685
PMCPMC9739638
OpenAlexW4311014564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.