ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022
Myocardial Injury in Hospitalized Patients with Myasthenia Gravis.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beyond Acute Coronary Syndromes: Troponins as Diagnostic and Prognostic Tools in Heart Failure.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Cardiac implications in myasthenia gravis.World journal of clinical cases · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the clinical characteristics and outcome of myocardial injury in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG). Methods: We retrospectively searched medical records to screen hospitalized patients with MG at our hospital. The troponin T (TnT) levels were deemed necessary to be performed based on the patient’s clinical symptoms and were used as biomarkers of myocardial injury. The patients’ demographic and clinical information were collected. Death was the primary outcome. Results: A total of 336 patients with MG measured TnT levels and were included in the final analysis. The male MG patients with elevated TnT levels had a higher prevalence of infection (56.8% vs. 30.0%, p = 0.001) and myasthenic crisis (37.5% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.001) than those with normal TnT levels. Meanwhile, the female MG patients with elevated TnT levels were older (56.0 (16.6) vs. 49.2 (17.2)) years old, p = 0.007] and had a higher prevalence of infection (65.4% vs. 32.1%, p < 0.001), myasthenic crisis (33.6% vs. 17.9%, p = 0.015), and thymoma (38.5% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.001) than those with normal TnT levels. Older age (coef. = 0.004; p = 0.034), infection (coef. = 0.240; p = 0.001), myasthenic crisis (coef. = 0.312; p < 0.001), thymoma (coef. = 0.228; p = 0.001), and ICI therapy (coef. = 1.220; p < 0.001) were independent risk predictors for increasing log TnT levels. Thirty-seven patients died during hospitalization. High log TnT levels (OR = 8.818; p < 0.001), female sex (OR = 0.346; p = 0.023), thymoma (OR = 5.092; p = 0.002), and infection (OR = 14.597; p < 0.001) were independent risk predictors of death. Conclusions: Our study revealed that the surveillance of myocardial injury biomarkers in MG patients might be beneficial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.