Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36498675›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Looking Back to Look Forward: What to Expect in a Redo Surgery for a Bioprosthesis Replacement.

Ilaria Giambuzzi, Giorgia Bonalumi, Giulia Ballan, Pietro Messi, Alice Bonomi, Analia Maggiore, Giampiero Esposito, Michele Di Mauro, Francesco Alamanni, Marco Zanobini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ilaria GiambuzziDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, 20137 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3889-2406
Giorgia BonalumiDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, 20137 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2353-0664
Giulia BallanDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, 20137 Milan, Italy.
Pietro MessiI.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio, 20157 Milan, Italy.
Alice BonomiDepartment of Biostatistics, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, 20137, Milan, Italy.
Analia MaggioreDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, 20137 Milan, Italy.
Giampiero EspositoDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, 20137 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6178-0811
Michele Di MauroCardio-Thoracic Surgery Department, Heart & Vascular Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2611-5626
Francesco AlamanniI.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio, 20157 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0213-3715
Marco ZanobiniDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, 20137 Milan, Italy.
Centro Cardiologico Monzino · ITMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

Italian Ministry of Health-Ricerca Corrente to Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS 2771958
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Redo surgeries are becoming more common because of an increased rate of bioprosthesis implantation. We performed a retrospective study on patients who underwent redo replacement of an aortic and/or mitral bioprosthesis between 2005 and 2018 to evaluate intra-hospital mortality and morbidity. Univariate analysis was performed on the propensity score variables to determine predictors of mortality. A total of 180 patients were enrolled in the study: Group A (replacement of aortic bioprosthesis) with 136 patients (75.56%) and group B (replacement of mitral bioprosthesis ± aortic bioprosthesis) with 44 patients (24.44%). NYHA class ≥ 3 and female sex were significantly more common in group B. Cardiopulmonary-bypass time and aortic cross-clamping time in group A and group B were, respectively, 154.95 ± 74.35 and 190.25 ± 77.44 (p = 0.0005) and 115.99 ± 53.54 and 144.91 ± 52.53 (p = 0.0004). Overall mortality was 8.89%. After propensity score adjustment, Group B was confirmed to have an increased risk of death (OR 3.32 CI 95% 1.02−10.88 p < 0.0001), gastrointestinal complications (OR 7.784 CI 95% 1.005−60.282 p < 0.0002) and pulmonary complications (OR 2.381 CI 95% 1.038−5.46 p < 0.0001). At the univariate analysis, endocarditis, cardiopulmonary-bypass and aortic cross clamping time, NYHA class ≥ 3 and urgency setting were significantly associated to death. Intra-hospital outcomes were acceptable regarding mortality and complications. Patients who need redo surgery on mitral bioprosthesis have an increased risk of post-operative pulmonary and gastrointestinal complications and mortality. Therefore the choice of mitral bioprosthesis at time of first surgery should be carefully evaluated.

Indexed as

bioprosthesis replacementendocarditisredo surgerystructural valve degeneration

Identifiers

PMID36498675
PMCPMC9735554
OpenAlexW4310478660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.