Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36498662›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

A Prospective Validation Study of the Functional Bedside Aspiration Screen with Endoscopy: Is It Clinically Applicable in Acute Stroke?

Rebecca Kassubek, Beate Lindner-Pfleghar, Ioanna Eleni Virvidaki, Jan Kassubek, Katharina Althaus, Antonia Maria Weber, Georgios Dimakopoulos, Haralampos Milionis, Grigorios Nasios

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 77% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rebecca KassubekDepartment of Neurology, University of Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Beate Lindner-PflegharDepartment of Neurology, University of Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Ioanna Eleni VirvidakiDepartment of Speech and Language Therapy, University of Ioannina, 45500 Ioannina, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-1550-233X
Jan KassubekDepartment of Neurology, University of Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7106-9270
Katharina AlthausDepartment of Neurology, University of Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9004-4335
Antonia Maria WeberDepartment of Neurology, University of Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Georgios DimakopoulosBiostats, Epirus Science and Technology Park Campus, University of Ioannina, 45500 Ioannina, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-2351-7411
Haralampos MilionisDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-3958-2266
Grigorios NasiosDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-7495-6863
Universität Ulm · DEUniversity of Ioannina · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability of the novel Functional Bedside Aspiration Screen (FBAS) to predict aspiration risk in acute stroke and to guide initial therapy needs. We conducted a prospective validation study of the FBAS 10-point scale in 101 acute ischemic stroke patients. Outcome measures were compared with the Penetration Aspiration Scale (PAS) via the Flexible Endoscopic Swallowing Study. Correlations with the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) and the Therapy Requirement Scale (TRS) were analyzed. We observed a 65.8% sensitivity and 70.2% specificity (

Indexed as

aspirationFEESnutritional needsstrokeswallowing riskswallow screen

Identifiers

PMID36498662
PMCPMC9737958
OpenAlexW4310398153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.