Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36498594›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Factors Affecting the Usage of Wearable Device Technology for Healthcare among Indian Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Vathsala Patil, Deepak Kumar Singhal, Nithesh Naik, B M Zeeshan Hameed, Milap J Shah, Sufyan Ibrahim, Komal Smriti, Gaurav Chatterjee, Ameya Kale, Anshika Sharma and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Vathsala PatilDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India.
Deepak Kumar SinghalDepartment of Public Health Dentistry, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India.
Nithesh NaikDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0356-7697
B M Zeeshan HameediTRUE (International Training and Research in Uro-Oncology and Endourology) Group, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India.
Milap J ShahiTRUE (International Training and Research in Uro-Oncology and Endourology) Group, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India.
Sufyan IbrahimiTRUE (International Training and Research in Uro-Oncology and Endourology) Group, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9127-2738
Komal SmritiDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India.
Gaurav ChatterjeeDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India.
Ameya KaleKasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India.
Anshika SharmaDepartment of Psychology, Amity University, Noida 201313, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Rahul PauliTRUE (International Training and Research in Uro-Oncology and Endourology) Group, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1491-1166
Piotr ChłostaDepartment of Urology, Jagiellonian University in Krakow, 31-007 Kraków, Poland.
Bhaskar K SomaniDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6248-6478
Manipal Academy of Higher Education · INAmity University · INCenter for Biologics Evaluation and Research · USFather Muller Medical College Hospital · INJagiellonian University · PLMax Healthcare · INMayo Clinic · USUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWearable device technology has recently been involved in the healthcare industry substantially. India is the world's third largest market for wearable devices and is projected to expand at a compound annual growth rate of ~26.33%. However, there is a paucity of literature analyzing the factors determining the acceptance of wearable healthcare device technology among low-middle-income countries.

methodsThis cross-sectional, web-based survey aims to analyze the perceptions affecting the adoption and usage of wearable devices among the Indian population aged 16 years and above.

resultsA total of 495 responses were obtained. In all, 50.3% were aged between 25-50 years and 51.3% belonged to the lower-income group. While 62.2% of the participants reported using wearable devices for managing their health, 29.3% were using them daily. technology and task fitness (TTF) showed a significant positive correlation with connectivity (

conclusionsThis study found a significant correlation with the adoption and acceptance of wearable devices for healthcare management in the Indian context.

Indexed as

fitness devicesinfotainmentmobile healthwearable healthcare deviceswearable technology

Identifiers

PMID36498594
PMCPMC9740494
OpenAlexW4310177882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.