ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022
Clinical Efficacy, Tolerability and Safety of a New Multiple-Action Eyedrop in Subjects with Moderate to Severe Dry Eye.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06478134 (Efficacy and Safety of a Multiple-Action Tear Substitute), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy and Safety of a Multiple-Action Tear Substitute (TriMix) in Dry Eye Disease: A Randomized, Double-blinded, HA-controlled Study
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Short-term adjunctive use of a liposomal tear substitute after repeated intravitreal therapy: a randomized pilot study.International ophthalmology · 2026Trial
- Efficacy and safety of a multi-action tear substitute based on 0.15% cross-linked hyaluronic acid, 3% trehalose and liposomes with stearylamine: A randomized, single-mask, controlled study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025Trial
- Impact of Lid Wipes and Tear Substitutes on Symptoms and Signs of Ocular Surface Disease After Cataract Surgery-A Real-Life Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the Ultrastructural Effects on Conjunctival Epithelial Cells of a New Multiple-Action Artificial Tear Containing Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid, Cationic Liposomes, and Trehalose with Transmission Electron Microscopy: A Pilot Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Prevalence of dry eye disease among IT students in Pakistan.International ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Efficacy assessment of liposome crosslinked hyaluronic acid and standard hyaluronic acid eye drops for dry eye disease management: a comparative study employing the ocular surface analyzer and subjective questionnaires.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Effectiveness of a New Active Tear Substitute Containing 0.2% Hyaluronic Acid and 0.001% Hydrocortisone on Signs and Symptoms of Dry Eye Disease by Means of Low- and High-Tech Assessments.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2024Article
- Hyaluronic Acid in Rheumatology.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To assess the clinical efficacy, tolerability and safety of a new-generation ophthalmic solution containing cross-linked hyaluronic acid 0.15% trehalose 3%, liposomes 1% and sterylamine 0.25% (Trimix® Off Health Italia, Firenze, Italy) (CXHAL) versus trehalose 3% (Thealoz®, Thea Pharmaceuticals, Clermont-Ferrand, France) (TRS) in subjects with moderate to severe dry eye disease (DED). Patients and methods: In this prospective, observational cohort study, 41 subjects with moderate to severe dry eye were enrolled and divided into two age- and sex-matched groups. Group 1 was treated with CXHA eye drops, and group 2 was treated with TRS eye drops four times daily for 2 months. All subjects were evaluated at baseline (V0) and at day 60 ± 3 (V1). The examination comprised Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) and Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE). Tear osmolarity was evaluated using the TearLab Osmolarity System®; Keratograph 5M (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) was performed to assess tear meniscus height (TMH), fluorescein tear break-up time (TBUT) and corneal and conjunctival fluorescein staining and meibography; furthermore, slit lamp evaluation was performed for eyelid erythema and edema, conjunctival chemosis and hyperemia and Meibomian gland secretion quality. Results: All patients completed the treatment. BCVA remained stable in both groups, and no adverse events were reported. After 2 months, both groups showed statistically significant improvements for SANDE (p = 0.001 and p = 0.012, respectively), TBUT values (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively) and staining (p = 0.004 and p = 0.001, respectively) as compared to baseline values. Group 1 showed a statistically significant improvement in SANDE frequency and tear osmolarity (p = 0.02 and p = 0.001, respectively), whereas chemosis was significantly reduced in group 2. The amount of TBUT improvement was statistically higher in group 1 compared to that in group 2 (p = 0.041). Conclusion: A new-generation multiple-action ophthalmic solution was safe and clinically effective in the treatment of moderate and severe dry eye, with significant improvements in the main ocular surface parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.