ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022
Analysis of the Frequency and Correlated Factors of Midpalatal Suture Maturation Stages in Young Adults, Based on Cone Beam Computed Tomography Imaging.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Is efficacy of miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion in mid to late adolescents and young adults related to craniofacial sutures opening? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal · 2025Pooled it
- Development of artificial neural network model for predicting the rapid maxillary expansion technique in children with cleft lip and palate.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2025Article
- Causes and Potential Solutions of Molar Buccal Inclination in Maxillary Skeletal Expander: A Retrospective CBCT Analysis.International journal of dentistry · 2025Article
- Midpalatal Suture Maturation in Relation to Age, Sex, and Facial Skeletal Growth Patterns: A CBCT Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe choice of whether to perform a palatal disjunction in constricted maxilla has traditionally been decided based on the age of the patients, although there are gradually increasing references to the fact that this is not a determining factor. The main goal of this study was to evaluate the frequency of the different stages of midpalatal suture maturation in a sample of young adults between 15 and 30 years of age. Other objectives also included analyzing the possible correlation the maturation stages could maintain with sex and age groups.
methods142 Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) scans of young adults were performed. The images were divided into four age groups based on age ranges of 15-18, 19-22, 23-26, and 27-30 years. Each group consisted of 26, 41, 39, and 36 patients, respectively, which were classified using Angelieri's method. In addition, sex and age groups were considered as variables, and the possible correlation of the prevalence of each one, according to age and sex, was studied.
resultsthe sample was classified into 4.9% stage B; 52.1% stage C; 27.5% stage D; and 15.5% stage E. In addition, no statistically significant correlation between sex and the maturation stages was found, but more advanced stages did appear to be related to the chronological age of the subjects.
conclusionsThe frequency of maturational stages where the suture is shown to be consolidated did not appear to be as high as expected; therefore, the idea of rejecting transverse plane treatment in a conventional manner in an out-of-growth patient should be discarded.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.