Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36498471›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022

Transversus Abdominis Plane Block as a Strategy for Effective Pain Management in Patients with Pain during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review.

Abdalkarem Fedgash Alsharari, Faud Hamdi Abuadas, Yaser Salman Alnassrallah, Dauda Salihu

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07513012 (Comparison of Efficacy of Unilateral Transversus Abdominis Plane), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07513012 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Efficacy of Unilateral Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block Versus Bilateral Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

TypeinterventionalSponsorKing Edward Medical UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled82ConditionsPost Operative Pain Control, PONVArmsUnilateral Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block with 0.25 % bupivacaine, Bilateral Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block with 0.25 % bupivacaine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Abdalkarem Fedgash AlsharariCollege of Nursing, Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-8911-3356
Faud Hamdi AbuadasCollege of Nursing, Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-4880-0862
Yaser Salman AlnassrallahMinistry of Health, Riyadh 12613, Saudi Arabia.
Dauda SalihuCollege of Nursing, Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-8651-7323
Jouf University · SAMinistry of Health · SA

Funding

Deanship of Scientific Research at Jouf University DSR2020-04-2628
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), unlike laparotomy, is an invasive surgical procedure, and some patients report mild to moderate pain after surgery. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block has been shown to be an appropriate method for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. However, there have been few studies on the efficacy of TAP block after LC surgery, with unclear information on the optimal dose, long-term effects, and clinical significance, and the analgesic efficacy of various procedures, hence the need for this review. Five electronic databases (PubMed, Academic Search Premier, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library) were searched for eligible studies published from inception to the present. Post-mean and standard deviation values for pain assessed were extracted, and mean changes per group were calculated. Clinical significance was determined using the distribution-based approach. Four different local anesthetics (Bupivacaine, Ropivacaine, Lidocaine, and Levobupivacaine) were used at varying concentrations from 0.2% to 0.375%. Ten different drug solutions (i.e., esmolol, Dexamethasone, Magnesium Sulfate, Ketorolac, Oxycodone, Epinephrine, Sufentanil, Tropisetron, normal saline, and Dexmedetomidine) were used as adjuvants. The optimal dose of local anesthetics for LC could be 20 mL with 0.4 mL/kg for port infiltration. Various TAP procedures such as ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (US-TAP) block and other strategies have been shown to be used for pain management in LC; however, TAP blockade procedures were reported to be the most effective method for analgesia compared with general anesthesia and port infiltration. Instead of 0.25% Bupivacaine, 1% Pethidine could be used for the TAP block procedures. Multimodal analgesia could be another strategy for pain management. Analgesia with TAP blockade decreases opioid consumption significantly and provides effective analgesia. Further studies should identify the long-term effects of different TAP block procedures.

Indexed as

anesthesiacholecystectomylaparoscopypain managementpostoperative

Identifiers

PMID36498471
PMCPMC9735918
OpenAlexW4309729144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.