ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022
Cardiomyopathy Associated with Right Ventricular Apical Pacing-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients With Atrioventricular Block: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2025Pooled it
- Effects of stress on myocardial perfusion and left ventricular synchrony in patients undergoing left bundle branch area pacing.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Predictors of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy in patients undergoing AV nodal ablation: insights from a Delphi process and retrospective cohort study.European heart journal open · 2026Article
- Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Interventions for Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.Cardiovascular therapeutics · 2026Review
- Screening for HFpEF in pacemaker patients: Study design and protocol of the PM-HFpEF study.PloS one · 2026Article
- The Impact of the Spatial Distribution of Ventricular Extrasystoles on Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Recipients.Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE · 2025Article
- Post-TAVI atrioventricular block: navigating the triple jeopardy of tricuspid regurgitation, pacemaker-induced heart failure, and left innominate vein obstruction.Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2025Article
- Apex vs. Septum Pacing: A Comprehensive Review of Pacemaker Implantation Strategies.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Outcomes of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in Patients with Pure Aortic Regurgitation after TAVI.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Impact of left atrial strain on clinical outcomes in patients with permanent pacemaker implantation.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
- Observational study of left bundle branch area pacing: implantation of the solia S lead using the selectra 3D sheath at an inclined angle.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Observational
- Prognostic Value of Four Preimplantation Malnutrition Estimation Tools in Predicting Heart Failure Hospitalization of the Older Diabetic Patients with Right Ventricular Pacing.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2023Observational
- Assessment of Clinical Outcomes and Electrophysiological Parameters of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing: A Single-center Prospective Study with 12-month Follow-up.International journal of applied & basic medical researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsBradyarrhythmias are potentially life-threatening medical conditions. The most widespread treatment for slow rhythms is artificial ventricular pacing. From the inception of the idea of artificial pacing, ventricular leads were located in the apex of the right ventricle. Right ventricular apical pacing (RVAP) was thought to have a deteriorating effect on left ventricular systolic function. The aim of this study was to systematically assess results of randomized controlled trials to determine the effects of right ventricular apical pacing on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).
methodswe systematically searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, and EMBASE databases for studies evaluating the influence of RVAP on LVEF. Pooled mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was estimated using a random effect model.
results14 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comprising 885 patients were included. In our meta-analysis, RVAP was associated with statistically significant left ventricular systolic function impairment as measured by LVEF. The mean difference between LVEF at baseline and after intervention amounted to 3.35% (95% CI: 1.80-4.91).
conclusionour meta-analysis confirms that right ventricular apical pacing is associated with progressive deterioration of left ventricular systolic function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.