ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022
Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Non-Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage and Ischemic Stroke Survivors.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Role of Aging in Intracerebral Hemorrhage.Brain sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe aimed to evaluate different measures of adverse cardiovascular events between non-traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICrH) and ischemic stroke (IS) survivors with and without atrial fibrillation (AF).
methodsUsing a national hospitalization database we compared incidences and risks of all-cause in-hospital death, cardiovascular death, non-cardiovascular death, MACE-HF (in-hospital cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, IS or new-onset heart failure [HF]) between ICrH and IS survivors with and without AF. Propensity-score matching was also performed.
resultsWe identified 40,523 survivors of IS and 12,028 survivors of an ICrH without AF, and 20,449 IS survivors and 3574 ICrH survivors with AF. In unadjusted, adjusted and matched analyses, ICrH patients without AF had a higher risk of all-cause in-hospital death (Hazard Ratio (HR; for matched analyses) 1.80; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.74-1.86), cardiovascular death (HR; 2.79; CI 2.64-2.94), MACE-HF (HR 1.97; CI 1.89-2.06) and new cerebrovascular events (HR 1.75; CI 1.57-1.96) but with lower risk of myocardial infarction (HR 0.81; CI 0.70-0.94), major bleeding (HR 0.92; CI 0.87-0.98) and new onset HF (HR 0.85; CI 0.79-0.91) compared to IS survivors without AF. Similar results were found for ICrH and IS survivors with AF except for myocardial infarction (HR 1.05; CI 0.79-1.34) and new onset HF (HR 0.94; CI 0.84-1.06) that were similar between the two groups.
conclusionsAdverse cardiovascular events are more frequent in ICrH survivors compared to IS survivors. New onset HF is a relatively frequent event after ICrH, especially in those patients with comorbid atrial fibrillation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.