Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36498368›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Perinatal Women's Views of Pharmacist-Delivered Perinatal Depression Screening: A Qualitative Study.

Lily Pham, Rebekah J Moles, Claire L O'Reilly, Stephen Carter, Camille Raynes-Greenow, Timothy F Chen, Corina Raduescu, Sue Randall, Jacqueline Bloomfield, Clara Strowel and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lily PhamThe University of Sydney School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2892-7927
Rebekah J MolesThe University of Sydney School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4043-6728
Claire L O'ReillyThe University of Sydney School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6416-8150
Stephen CarterThe University of Sydney School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4670-0884
Camille Raynes-GreenowSydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8802-6226
Timothy F ChenThe University of Sydney School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4189-8403
Corina RaduescuThe University of Sydney Business School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6281-9842
Sue RandallSusan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2068-1432
Jacqueline BloomfieldSusan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4376-0742
Clara StrowelSydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia.
Andrea MurphyCollege of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5093-6681
David GardnerCollege of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0980-6399
Sarira El-DenThe University of Sydney School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7500-3351
The University of Sydney · AUDalhousie University · CA

Funding

Lifespan Research Network n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Internationally, 20% of women experience perinatal depression (PND). Healthcare providers including general practitioners and midwives are critical in providing PND screening and support; however, the current workforce is unable to meet growing demands for PND care. As accessible and trusted primary healthcare professionals, pharmacists could provide PND care to complement existing services, thereby contributing to early detection and intervention. This study aimed to explore perinatal women's views of community pharmacist-delivered PND screening and care, with a focus on their attitudes towards and acceptability of PND screening implementation in community pharmacy. Semi-structured interviews with women (

Indexed as

Community Pharmacy ServicesGeneral PractitionersAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansPharmacistsPregnancyProfessional RoleQualitative Researchperinatal depressionpharmacist-deliveredpharmacyscreeningwomen

Identifiers

PMID36498368
PMCPMC9738857
OpenAlexW4311545749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.