Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36498277›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

A Qualitative Study to Understand the Impact of Caring for Traumatic Injury Survivors.

Catherine Hudson, Kate Radford, Jade Kettlewell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Catherine HudsonCentre for Rehabilitation and Ageing Research, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK.
Kate RadfordCentre for Rehabilitation and Ageing Research, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6246-3180
Jade KettlewellCentre for Academic Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6713-4551
University of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFollowing traumatic injury, an informal carer is often required to support recovery. Understanding the impact of caregiving is important to inform intervention design.

aimto explore the impact of caring on family and caregiver finances, employment, social life, and psychological wellbeing.

methodSemi-structured interviews conducted with carers of traumatic injury survivors. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed, informed by the Roy Adaptation Model (RAM) and International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).

resultsTen participants were interviewed. Key themes included (1) financial impact/employment issues, (2) relationships and support and (3) psychological impact. Most carers did not receive professional support with daily care post-discharge. Carers' employers responded positively, supporting them even after extensive leave. Carers received inconsistent communication whilst visiting trauma survivors in hospital; carers with healthcare experience were favoured. Navigating and receiving benefits was complex. Some carers found it difficult to accept the trauma survivor's injury, whilst others focused on achieving goals.

conclusionsSupport from professional services is limited outside hospital settings for non-brain injuries. Future interventions and healthcare services should acknowledge the lack of psychological support for carers. Researchers should consider using the ICF/RAM when designing interventions to ensure the full impact on carers is addressed.

Indexed as

AftercarePatient DischargeCaregiversHumansQualitative ResearchSurvivorscarer burdeninformal carerstraumatic injuries

Identifiers

PMID36498277
PMCPMC9737134
OpenAlexW4311519593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.