Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36498139›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Development, Validation, and Utilization of a Social Media Use and Mental Health Questionnaire among Middle Eastern and Western Adults: A Pilot Study from the UAE.

Omar Hegazi, Samer Alalalmeh, Ahmad Alfaresi, Soheil Dashtinezhad, Ahmed Bahada, Moyad Shahwan, Ammar Abdulrahman Jairoun, Tesleem K Babalola, Haya Yasin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Assessing mental health among students in the UAE: A cross-sectional study utilizing the DASS-21 scale.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Omar HegaziCollege of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Ajman University, Ajman 346, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0001-9258-5920
Samer AlalalmehCollege of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Ajman University, Ajman 346, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0002-4762-9311
Ahmad AlfaresiCollege of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Ajman University, Ajman 346, United Arab Emirates.
Soheil DashtinezhadCollege of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Ajman University, Ajman 346, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0003-3409-5805
Ahmed BahadaCollege of Engineering, University of Sharjah, Sharjah 27272, United Arab Emirates.
Moyad ShahwanCollege of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Ajman University, Ajman 346, United Arab Emirates.
Ammar Abdulrahman JairounHealth and Safety Department, Dubai Municipality, Dubai 67, United Arab Emirates.
Tesleem K BabalolaProgram in Public Health, Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.
Haya YasinCollege of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Ajman University, Ajman 346, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe aimed to develop and validate a mental health stigma measurement tool for use within the social media context, utilizing the tool to assess whether the stigma shown in face-to-face interactions translates to social media, coupled with comparing whether social media use can cause the stigma among a sample of Middle Eastern and Western populations.

methodsThe development and validation phase comprised a systematic process that was used to develop an assessment tool that could be used within the social media context and establish its validity and reliability. A 5-point Likert-type scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree) was developed to assess mental health stigma. The anonymous questionnaire was distributed from June 2022 to August 2022 on various social media platforms and groups predominated by the two demographics of interest, enrolling 1328 participants (with only 1001 responses deemed valid). The utilization phase consisted of bivariate and multivariable analysis of the data. The cutoff points for low, medium, and high scores were the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentil, respectively.

resultsThe instrument comprised three dimensions: acceptance, intolerance, and digital care sentiment. In the Middle Eastern subset of participants, a higher score of intolerance (more stigma) toward mental illness was found in 72.4% of the participants, with a higher score of acceptance being 35.1% and of digital care sentiment being 46.4%. The mean scores for all the scales were as follows: intolerance (3.08 ± 0.64), acceptance (3.87 ± 0.71), and digital care sentiment (3.18 ± 0.69). For Westerners, a higher score of intolerance toward mental illness was found in 24.0% of the participants, with a higher score of acceptance being 56.8% and of digital care sentiment being 38.2%. The mean scores for all the scales were as follows: intolerance (2.28 ± 0.73), acceptance (4.21 ± 0.61), and digital care sentiment (3.08 ± 0.62). Various results were obtained regarding the effect of individual social media platforms on the different subscales.

conclusionsStigma does follow people on social media, whether they are Middle Easterners or Westerners, although to varying degrees. The results of social media interaction and activity varied based on the group that used them, with some having an impact on one group but not the other. For these reasons, proper guidance is advised when utilizing and interacting with social media platforms.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersSocial MediaAdultHumansMental HealthPilot ProjectsReproducibility of ResultsSocial StigmaSurveys and Questionnairesmental healthquestionnairesocial mediastressvalidationyoung adults

Identifiers

PMID36498139
PMCPMC9736958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.