Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36498053›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Exploring the Role of Sclerostin as a Biomarker of Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality: A Scoping Review.

Raquel Sanabria-de la Torre, Sheila González-Salvatierra, Cristina García-Fontana, Francisco Andújar-Vera, Beatriz García-Fontana, Manuel Muñoz-Torres, Blanca Riquelme-Gallego

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Raquel Sanabria-de la TorreInstituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada (ibs.GRANADA), 18014 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3261-6745
Sheila González-SalvatierraInstituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada (ibs.GRANADA), 18014 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6413-7001
Cristina García-FontanaInstituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada (ibs.GRANADA), 18014 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9328-6022
Francisco Andújar-VeraInstituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada (ibs.GRANADA), 18014 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2663-8809
Beatriz García-FontanaInstituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada (ibs.GRANADA), 18014 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4134-5561
Manuel Muñoz-TorresInstituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada (ibs.GRANADA), 18014 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9645-3260
Blanca Riquelme-GallegoInstituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada (ibs.GRANADA), 18014 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3422-7310
Universidad de Granada · ESInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sclerostin is most recognized for its role in controlling bone formation; however, it is also expressed in the heart, aorta, coronary, and peripheral arteries. Human studies have associated high circulating sclerostin levels with the presence of different cardiovascular diseases (CVD), surrogate CVD markers, and a high risk of cardiovascular events in some populations. However, this is still a matter of scientific debate, as the results have been very heterogeneous among studies. In the present review, the association between serum sclerostin levels and CVD and/or cardiovascular mortality was analyzed. For this purpose, a scoping review was performed in which articles measuring serum sclerostin levels and cardiovascular risk in patients were selected. Eleven articles answered the research question; of these articles, 8/11 evaluated the association between sclerostin and CVD, of which 4/8 found a positive association, 2/8 found a negative association, and 2/8 found no association between variables. Five (5/11) of the articles included in the study evaluated cardiovascular mortality, of which 3/5 found a positive association, 1/5 found a negative association, and 1/5 found no association between variables. In conclusion, we did not find sufficient results to be able to demonstrate an association between elevated sclerostin levels and the development of CVD and/or cardiovascular mortality in the general population due to heterogeneity in the results. However, there seems to be a tendency to consider increased sclerostin levels as a risk factor for both the development of cardiovascular events and cardiovascular mortality in specific populations. Further studies in this field will help to solve some of the inconsistencies found during this scoping review and allow for the future use of sclerostin measurement as a strategy in the prevention and diagnosis of CVD and/or cardiovascular mortality.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesBiomarkersBone Morphogenetic ProteinsGenetic MarkersHumansRisk FactorsBiomarkersBone Morphogenetic ProteinsGenetic Markersbiomarkerscardiovascular diseasecardiovascular mortalitycardiovascular risksclerostin

Identifiers

PMID36498053
PMCPMC9739125
OpenAlexW4310472786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.