Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36498017›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

The Association of Resilience with Mental Health in a Large Population-Based Sample (LIFE-Adult-Study).

Elena Caroline Weitzel, Margrit Löbner, Heide Glaesmer, Andreas Hinz, Samira Zeynalova, Sylvia Henger, Christoph Engel, Nigar Reyes, Kerstin Wirkner, Markus Löffler and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Resilience Amid Racialized Emasculation: the Role of Religion for US Asian Men.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elena Caroline WeitzelInstitute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health (ISAP), Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, Philipp-Rosenthal-Str. 55, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1469-1514
Margrit LöbnerInstitute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health (ISAP), Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, Philipp-Rosenthal-Str. 55, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5984-8127
Heide GlaesmerDepartment of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, Philipp-Rosenthal-Str. 55, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3752-7653
Andreas HinzDepartment of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, Philipp-Rosenthal-Str. 55, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Samira ZeynalovaInstitute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, Härtel-Str. 16-18, 04107 Leipzig, Germany.
Sylvia HengerInstitute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, Härtel-Str. 16-18, 04107 Leipzig, Germany.
Christoph EngelInstitute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, Härtel-Str. 16-18, 04107 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7247-282X
Nigar ReyesInstitute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, Härtel-Str. 16-18, 04107 Leipzig, Germany.
Kerstin WirknerLIFE-Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases, University of Leipzig, Philipp-Rosenthal-Str. 27, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Markus LöfflerInstitute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, Härtel-Str. 16-18, 04107 Leipzig, Germany.
Steffi G Riedel-HellerInstitute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health (ISAP), Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, Philipp-Rosenthal-Str. 55, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4321-6090
Leipzig University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resilience describes a good adaptation to adversity. Strengthening resilience is a promising approach in the prevention of mental health problems. Yet, research on the association of resilience with mental health symptoms in the general population is scarce. The aim of our study is to examine comprehensively the association of resilience with depressive symptoms, anxiety, and perceived stress in a large population-based sample. We analyzed data of n = 3762 participants from the follow-up assessment of the LIFE-Adult-Study, a population-based cohort study in Leipzig. Assessments included resilience (RS-11), depressive symptoms (CES-D), anxiety (GAD-7), and perceived stress (PSQ). The association of resilience with mental health symptoms was examined via multiple linear regression analyses. In our analyses, higher resilience predicted less mental health problems and contributed significantly to the explained variance in mental health outcomes. Women, individuals with previous mental disorders, and those without employment had higher mental health symptoms. Resilience is closely associated with mental health problems in the general population. Vulnerable groups should be targeted with public health measures. Strengthening resilience is a promising approach in the large-scale prevention of mental disorders.

Indexed as

Mental HealthResilience, PsychologicalAdultAnxietyCohort StudiesDepressionEmploymentFemaleHumansanxiety symptomsdepressive symptomsgeneral populationperceived stresspreventionresilience

Identifiers

PMID36498017
PMCPMC9740913
OpenAlexW4310999129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.