Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36498016›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Occupational Well-Being of Multidisciplinary PHC Teams: Barriers/Facilitators and Negotiations to Improve Working Conditions.

Marta Regina Cezar-Vaz, Daiani Modernel Xavier, Clarice Alves Bonow, Joana Cezar Vaz, Letícia Silveira Cardoso, Cynthia Fontella Sant'Anna, Valdecir Zavarese da Costa, Carlos Henrique Cardona Nery, Helena Maria Almeida Macedo Loureiro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marta Regina Cezar-VazSchool of Nursing, Federal University of Rio Grande, Rio Grande 96203-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0754-7469
Daiani Modernel XavierSchool of Nursing, Federal University of Rio Grande, Rio Grande 96203-900, Brazil.
Clarice Alves BonowFaculty of Nursing, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas 96010-610, Brazil.
Joana Cezar VazFundação Getúlio Vargas, Rio de Janeiro 22231-010, Brazil.
Letícia Silveira CardosoDepartment of Nursing, Federal University of Pampa, Uruguaiana 97501-970, Brazil.
Cynthia Fontella Sant'AnnaDepartment of Nursing, Federal University of Pampa, Uruguaiana 97501-970, Brazil.
Valdecir Zavarese da CostaDepartment of Nursing, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria 97105-900, Brazil.
Carlos Henrique Cardona NeryInstitute of Human and Information Sciences-ICHI, Federal University of Rio Grande-Santa Vitória do Palmar Campus, Santa Vitória do Palmar 96230-000, Brazil.
Helena Maria Almeida Macedo LoureiroSchool of Health Sciences, Santiago University Campus, University of Aveiro (ESSUA), 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1826-5923

Funding

National Council for Scientific and Technological Development No. 435344/2018-8 and No. 308018/2019-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Well-being at work is one of the factors determining healthy work conditions and is perceived by workers as a positive psychological state. In this study, the concept of well-being at work was used together with occupational functionality (i.e., current health state, current work environment, and barriers/facilitators to implementing well-being at work), occupational risk perception, and proactivity/negotiations held by workers to improve working conditions. In this context, the objectives were to identify the socio-demographic and occupational characteristics independently associated with levels of well-being at work of the multidisciplinary PHC health team; detect barriers or facilitators resulting from the attitudes of colleagues, community members, and managers that influence the well-being at work of the multidisciplinary health team; and identify with whom and what reasons led health workers to become proactive and negotiate improved working conditions. This cross-sectional study addressed 338 health workers from the multidisciplinary teams of PHC outpatient services in the extreme south of Brazil. Multivariate linear regression models were adopted to analyze data. The results show various independent associations with levels of well-being at work. Nursing workers (technicians and nurses) more frequently expressed job commitment and job satisfaction. Difficulties in solving problems and performing work routines, and co-workers' attitudes directly influence the well-being of the PHC team members. Risk perception (physical and chemical) also influences well-being. Negotiations in which PHC managers engaged to improve working conditions appeared as a significant predictor of job commitment, job satisfaction, and job involvement. The results reveal that well-being at work is an important indicator of the potential of workers' proactivity in negotiating improved working conditions.

Indexed as

Nursing StaffWorking ConditionsCross-Sectional StudiesHealth PersonnelHumansJob SatisfactionSurveys and Questionnairesjob commitmentjob involvementjob satisfactionnegotiationsprimary health carerisk perceptionwell-being at workworking conditions

Identifiers

PMID36498016
PMCPMC9737019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.