Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36497957›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Analysis of the Impact of Communication Campaigns under the Project "Syphilis No": A National Tool for Inducing and Promoting Health.

Jordana Crislayne de Lima Paiva, Sara Dias-Trindade, Mario Orestes Aguirre Gonzalez, Daniele Montenegro da Silva Barros, Pablo Holanda Cardoso, Pedro Henrique Castro Bezerra, Thaisa Gois Farias de Moura Santos Lima, Juciano de Sousa Lacerda, Lilian Carla Muneiro, Aliete Cunha-Oliveira and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jordana Crislayne de Lima PaivaLaboratory of Technological Innovation in Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59010-090, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4463-4967
Sara Dias-TrindadeCentre for Interdisciplinary Studies (CEIS20), University of Porto, 4099-002 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-5927-3957
Mario Orestes Aguirre GonzalezPostgraduate Program in Production Engineering, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59078-970, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6477-5196
Daniele Montenegro da Silva BarrosLaboratory of Technological Innovation in Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59010-090, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5037-1545
Pablo Holanda CardosoLaboratory of Technological Innovation in Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59010-090, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6642-3482
Pedro Henrique Castro BezerraLaboratory of Technological Innovation in Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59010-090, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7381-7538
Thaisa Gois Farias de Moura Santos LimaFederal Senate of Brazil, Brasilia 70160-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8276-4124
Juciano de Sousa LacerdaLaboratory of Technological Innovation in Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59010-090, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0876-377X
Lilian Carla MuneiroLaboratory of Technological Innovation in Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59010-090, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2226-7297
Aliete Cunha-OliveiraHealth Sciences Research Unit: Nursing (UICISA:E), Nursing School of Coimbra (ESEnfC), CEIS20-UC, 3000-457 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-8399-8619
Ana Paula CamarneiroHealth Sciences Research Unit: Nursing (UICISA:E), Nursing School of Coimbra (ESEnfC), 3000-076 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-3432-9261
Ingridy Marina Pierre BarbalhoLaboratory of Technological Innovation in Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59010-090, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5696-4114
Ricardo Alexsandro de Medeiros ValentimLaboratory of Technological Innovation in Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59010-090, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9216-8593

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Syphilis is increasingly prevalent around the world as a result of complex factors. In Brazil, the government declared a syphilis epidemic in 2016 and then set a strategic agenda to respond to this serious public health problem. In a joint effort, Brazil's Federal Court of Accounts (TCU) recommended that novel and diversified health communication strategies should be developed, which the "Syphilis No" project (SNP) later conducted through nationwide mass communication campaigns. We performed exploratory data analysis to identify and understand the results of three health communication campaigns by considering syphilis data trends in Brazil. The SNP, by using traditional and innovative means of communication, focused on multiple target audiences to encourage behavior changes through awareness and syphilis knowledge acquisition via the internet. In addition, the SNP disseminated information on syphilis testing, prevention, and treatment through social media and multiple media outlets. We observed that the period of the health campaigns corresponded to the period when the syphilis testing uptake increased and the number of reported cases dropped. Thus, our findings indicate that public health responses could substantially benefit from the use of health communication campaigns as a tool for health promotion, education, and transformation.

Indexed as

Health CommunicationSyphilisBrazilCommunicationHealth PromotionHumansPublic Healthhealth communication campaignsperformance indicatorspublic health promotionsyphilis

Identifiers

PMID36497957
PMCPMC9739525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.