Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36497943›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Estimating Implicit and Explicit Gender Leadership Bias among Primary Healthcare Professionals in Saudi Arabia.

Fahad Alzahrani, Khalid Al-Mansour, Ghadah Alarifi, Saad Alyahya, Nasser AlMehaizie, Hanaa Almoaibed

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Implicit Bias in Health Professionals: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Fahad AlzahraniClinical and Hospital Pharmacy Department, College of Pharmacy, Taibah University, Madinah 42353, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-1240-5008
Khalid Al-MansourDepartment of Studies and Research, King Abdulaziz Center for National Dialogue, Riyadh 13312, Saudi Arabia.
Ghadah AlarifiCollege of Business Administration, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh 11564, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-5180-6288
Saad AlyahyaRiyadh Third Health Cluster, Ministry of Health, Riyadh 11622, Saudi Arabia.
Nasser AlMehaizieDepartment of Studies and Research, King Abdulaziz Center for National Dialogue, Riyadh 13312, Saudi Arabia.
Hanaa AlmoaibedKing Faisal Center for Research and Islamic Studies, Riyadh 12212, Saudi Arabia.
King Faisal Center for Research and Islamic Studies · SAMinistry of Health · SAPrincess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University · SATaibah University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Women have become more influential and powerful; however, implicit bias continues to plague organizations when it comes to women in leadership positions. This study examines the implicit and explicit biases that favor men as leaders among Saudi Arabian primary healthcare professionals. (2) Methods: A secure, web-based survey was administered to primary healthcare professionals. The survey included questions about leadership as well as an Implicit Association Test (IAT) for implicit gender bias. (3) Results: Out of 690 eligible, 448 respondents completed the survey, representing a response rate of 65%. Male residents had a mean IAT score of 0.27 (SD 0.31) and females 0.12 (SD 0.29), both favoring males in leadership roles, and the difference was statistically significant. There was a significant association between gender and gender IAT. In the explicit bias, gender, education, gender of the current manager, and being manager were associated with the gender explicit bias. Explicit bias favoring males in leadership roles was associated with increased implicit bias favoring males in leadership roles. (4) Conclusions: This study found that explicit and implicit gender bias is present among primary healthcare professionals favoring men in leadership positions held by both men and women.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelSexismFemaleHumansLeadershipMalePrimary Health CareSaudi Arabiagender biasimplicitimplicit association testwomen leaders

Identifiers

PMID36497943
PMCPMC9739734
OpenAlexW4310182872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.