Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36497830›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Consumers' Acceptability and Perception of Edible Insects as an Emerging Protein Source.

Marta Ros-Baró, Violeida Sánchez-Socarrás, Maria Santos-Pagès, Anna Bach-Faig, Alicia Aguilar-Martínez

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07456319 (Sustainable Insect-based Protein Supplement in the Elderly), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07456319 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Sustainable Insect-based Protein Supplement in the Elderly: a Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversitat Oberta de CatalunyaRan2024 to 2024Enrolled30ConditionsAging, Nutrition, Sustainable Diets, Cardiometabolic HealthArmsINSECT - Protein suplement based on edible insect flour, Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Sustainable Meat Alternatives: Incorporation ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  12. Methods of Protein Extraction from House Crickets (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marta Ros-BaróFaculty of Health Sciences, Open University of Catalonia (UOC), 08018 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5163-1580
Violeida Sánchez-SocarrásFaculty of Health Sciences, Open University of Catalonia (UOC), 08018 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9953-3311
Maria Santos-PagèsFaculty of Health Sciences, Open University of Catalonia (UOC), 08018 Barcelona, Spain.
Anna Bach-FaigFoodLab Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, Open University of Catalonia (UOC), 08018 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8861-8013
Alicia Aguilar-MartínezFoodLab Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, Open University of Catalonia (UOC), 08018 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1004-9548

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years in Western Europe, studies on entomophagy have drawn the attention of many researchers interested in identifying parameters that could improve the acceptability of insect consumption in order to introduce insects as a sustainable source of protein into the future diet. Analysing the factors involved in consumer acceptability in the Mediterranean area could help to improve their future acceptance. A cross-sectional study was conducted using an ad-hoc questionnaire in which 1034 consumers participated. The questionnaire responses allowed us to study the areas relevant to acceptance: neophobia, social norms, familiarity, experiences of consumption and knowledge of benefits. Only 13.15% of participants had tried insects. Disgust, lack of custom and food safety were the main reasons for avoiding insect consumption. Consequently, preparations with an appetising appearance need to be offered, with flours being the most accepted format. The 40-59-year-old age group was the one most willing to consume them. To introduce edible insects as food in the future, it is important to inform people about their health, environmental and economic benefits because that could increase their willingness to include them in their diet.

Indexed as

Edible InsectsAdultAnimalsConsumer BehaviorCross-Sectional StudiesFoodHumansInsectaMiddle AgedPerceptionedible insectsentomophagyfood choicefood neophobiafood preferencesnutrition surveys

Identifiers

PMID36497830
PMCPMC9739510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.