Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36497812›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Application of Percutaneous Needle Electrolysis Does Not Elicit Temperature Changes: An In Vitro Cadaveric Study.

Sergio Borrella-Andrés, Miguel Malo-Urriés, Albert Pérez-Bellmunt, José L Arias-Buría, Jacobo Rodríguez-Sanz, María Isabel Albarova-Corral, Vanessa González-Rueda, Gracia M Gallego-Sendarrubias, César Fernández-de-Las-Peñas, Carlos López-de-Celis

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05826301 (Percutaneous Neuromodulation in Tibial Nerve vs. Electrolysis in Plantar Fasciitis Subjects), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05826301 nacompletednot on this map

Percutaneous Neuromodulation in Tibial Nerve vs. Electrolysis in Plantar Fasciitis Subjects

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad Europea de MadridRan2020 to 2023Enrolled67ConditionsPlantar FascitisArmsPercutaneous neuromodulation in tibial nerve, Percutaneous electrolysis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sergio Borrella-AndrésHealth Sciences Faculty, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.
Miguel Malo-UrriésHealth Sciences Faculty, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.
Albert Pérez-BellmuntFaculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, 08017 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5607-0708
José L Arias-BuríaDepartment of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 28922 Alcorcón, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8548-4427
Jacobo Rodríguez-SanzFaculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, 08017 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0419-1943
María Isabel Albarova-CorralHealth Sciences Faculty, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1292-3163
Vanessa González-RuedaFaculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, 08017 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7137-3184
Gracia M Gallego-SendarrubiasDepartment of Physical Therapy, Camilo José Cela University, 28692 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3471-3717
César Fernández-de-Las-PeñasDepartment of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 28922 Alcorcón, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3772-9690
Carlos López-de-CelisFaculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, 08017 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9524-4248
Universitat Internacional de Catalunya · ESUniversidad de Zaragoza · ESUniversidad Rey Juan Carlos · ESCamilo José Cela University · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Percutaneous needle electrolysis (PNE) consists of the ultrasound-guided application of a galvanic electrical current through a solid filament needle. One proposed therapeutic mechanism for this intervention is a potential thermal effect. The aim of this study was to investigate if the application of PNE induces changes in temperature in different cadaveric musculoskeletal tissues. A repeated measure experimental cadaveric study was designed with 10 cryopreserved knees (5 men, 5 women). Sterile stainless-steel needles of 40 mm length and 0.30 mm caliber were used in this study. An ultrasound-guided needling puncture was performed in the targeted tissue (patellar tendon, infra-patellar fat, and vastus medialis muscle). Additionally, the tip of the needle was placed next to the thermometer sensor at the minimum possible distance without direct contact with it. The temperature differences before and after different applications were measured. The applications were: three applications for 3 s of 3 mA of intensity (3:3:3) when the tendon was the targeted tissue, three applications for 3 s of 1.5 mA of intensity (1.5:3:3) when the fat or muscle was the targeted tissue, and 24 s of 1 mA of intensity (1:24:1) in all tissues. No statistically significant Group*Time interactions were found in any tissue (tendon: F = 0.571,

Indexed as

ElectrolysisPatellar LigamentCadaverFemaleHumansMaleResearch DesignTemperaturecadaverEPIpercutaneous needle electrolysistemperature

Identifiers

PMID36497812
PMCPMC9735625
OpenAlexW4311006492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.