Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36497761›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Historical Aspects of Herbal Use and Comparison of Current Regulations of Herbal Products between Mexico, Canada and the United States of America.

Patricia Rojas, Helgi Jung-Cook, Elizabeth Ruiz-Sánchez, Irma Susana Rojas-Tomé, Carolina Rojas, Arely M López-Ramírez, Aldo Arturo Reséndiz-Albor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Toxicological Profile of aJournal of toxicology · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A review ofAmerican journal of translational research · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Patricia RojasLaboratorio de Inmunidad de Mucosas, Sección de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación, Escuela Superior de Medicina del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Plan de San Luis esq. Salvador Díaz Mirón s/n, Mexico City C.P. 11340, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-9079-3267
Helgi Jung-CookFacultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City C.P. 04510, Mexico.
Elizabeth Ruiz-SánchezLaboratorio de Neurotoxicología, Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía "Manuel Velasco Suárez", SSA, Av. Insurgentes Sur No. 3877, Mexico City C.P. 14269, Mexico.
Irma Susana Rojas-ToméLaboratorio de Neuropsicofarmacología, Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía "Manuel Velasco Suárez", SSA, Av. Insurgentes Sur No. 3877, Mexico City C.P. 14269, Mexico.
Carolina RojasInstituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City C.P. 04510, Mexico.
Arely M López-RamírezLaboratorio de Neurotoxicología, Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía "Manuel Velasco Suárez", SSA, Av. Insurgentes Sur No. 3877, Mexico City C.P. 14269, Mexico.
Aldo Arturo Reséndiz-AlborLaboratorio de Inmunidad de Mucosas, Sección de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación, Escuela Superior de Medicina del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Plan de San Luis esq. Salvador Díaz Mirón s/n, Mexico City C.P. 11340, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-1415-5524

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increased life expectancy and high costs of medicines and medical care have led to the use of herbal products. However, these items may contain toxic compounds that have an impact on public health. We will focus on the regulatory aspects and differences of these products marketed in the North American region (USA-Mexico-Canada) from government websites and selected literature. Mexico has an ancestral tradition of using plants for the treatment, improvement, and maintenance of human health as compared with Canada and the USA Currently, the use of herbal products in this region has a regulatory framework. The legal framework in these three countries is related to their history, idiosyncrasies, socio-economic and cultural aspects. Therefore, there are different public policies for herbal products consumed in the region. Mexico has a more specific classification of these products. In Canada, all herbal products are classified as natural health products and the safety and efficacy must be scientifically proven. In the USA, the development of botanical drugs is very recent. In particular, both herbal products classified as food supplements in Mexico and dietary supplements in the USA may have risks in both safety and efficacy.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsPlantsCanadaHumansMexicoUnited Statesbotanical drugCanadadietary supplementsherbal medicineherbal productslegislation for herbal productsMexiconatural health productsregulations for herbal productsregulatory scienceUnited States of America

Identifiers

PMID36497761
PMCPMC9740500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.