Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36497728›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Digital Health Care, Telemedicine, and Medicolegal Issues in Orthopedics: A Review.

Davide Ferorelli, Lorenzo Moretti, Marcello Benevento, Maurizio Mastrapasqua, Michele Telegrafo, Biagio Solarino, Alessandro Dell'Erba, Davide Bizzoca, Biagio Moretti

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Davide FerorelliSection of Legal Medicine, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari, 70121 Bari, Italy.
Lorenzo MorettiOrthopedics and Trauma Unit, AOUC Policlinico di Bari, Department DiBraiN, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70121 Bari, Italy.
Marcello BeneventoSection of Legal Medicine, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari, 70121 Bari, Italy.
Maurizio MastrapasquaSection of Legal Medicine, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari, 70121 Bari, Italy.
Michele TelegrafoSection of Legal Medicine, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari, 70121 Bari, Italy.
Biagio SolarinoSection of Legal Medicine, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari, 70121 Bari, Italy.
Alessandro Dell'ErbaSection of Legal Medicine, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari, 70121 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3767-014X
Davide BizzocaOrthopedics and Trauma Unit, AOUC Policlinico di Bari, Department DiBraiN, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70121 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7516-2333
Biagio MorettiOrthopedics and Trauma Unit, AOUC Policlinico di Bari, Department DiBraiN, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70121 Bari, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of technologies in medicine has great potential to reduce the costs of health care services by making appropriate decisions that provide timely patient care. The evolution of telemedicine poses a series of clinical and medicolegal considerations. However, only a few articles have dealt with telemedicine and orthopedics. This review assesses the ethical and medicolegal issues related to tele-orthopedics. A systematic review was performed including papers published between 2017 and 2021 focusing on the main medicolegal and clinical-governance aspects of tele-orthopedics. Most of the articles were published during the COVID-19 pandemic, confirming the impetus that the pandemic has also given to the spread of telemedicine in the orthopedic field. The areas of interest dealt with in the scientific evidence, almost exclusively produced in the USA, Europe, the UK, and Canada, are quality, patient satisfaction, and safety. The impact of telemedicine in orthopedics has not yet been fully evaluated and studied in terms of the potential medicolegal concerns. Most of the authors performed qualitative studies with poor consistency. Authorizations and accreditations, protection of patient confidentiality, and professional responsibility are issues that will certainly soon emerge.

Indexed as

COVID-19OrthopedicsTelemedicineDelivery of Health CareHumansPandemicsclinical risk managementlegal medicinetelemedicinetele-orthopedics

Identifiers

PMID36497728
PMCPMC9735483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.