Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36497526›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Calling for Help-Peer-Based Psychosocial Support for Medical Staff by Telephone-A Best Practice Example from Germany.

Dominik Hinzmann, Andrea Forster, Marion Koll-Krüsmann, Andreas Schießl, Frederick Schneider, Tanja Sigl-Erkel, Andreas Igl, Susanne Katharina Heininger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dominik HinzmannDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5943-352X
Andrea ForsterAssociation for Psychosocial Competence and Support in Acute Care-PSU-Akut, 81373 Munich, Germany.
Marion Koll-KrüsmannAssociation for Psychosocial Competence and Support in Acute Care-PSU-Akut, 81373 Munich, Germany.
Andreas SchießlAssociation for Psychosocial Competence and Support in Acute Care-PSU-Akut, 81373 Munich, Germany.
Frederick SchneiderDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany.
Tanja Sigl-ErkelAssociation for Psychosocial Competence and Support in Acute Care-PSU-Akut, 81373 Munich, Germany.
Andreas IglAssociation for Psychosocial Competence and Support in Acute Care-PSU-Akut, 81373 Munich, Germany.
Susanne Katharina HeiningerAssociation for Psychosocial Competence and Support in Acute Care-PSU-Akut, 81373 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7678-8533

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA telephone support hotline (PSU-HELPLINE) was established at the beginning of the pandemic due to the burden on health professionals and the lack of support at the workplace. The aim of this study was to evaluate the telephone support service for health professionals in terms of its burden, benefits, and mechanisms of action.

methodsData collection was conducted during and after calls by PSU-HELPLINE counsellors. In addition to the socio-demographic data evaluation, burdens of the callers and the benefits of the calls were collected. The content-analytical evaluation of the stresses as well as the effect factors were based on Mayring's (2022).

resultsMost of the callers were highly to very highly stressed. The usefulness of the conversation was rated as strong to very strong by both callers and counsellors. The PSU-HELPLINE was used primarily for processing serious events and in phases of overload. The support work was carried out through the following aspects of so-called effect factors, among others: psychoeducation, change of perspective, resource activation, problem actualization, connectedness, information, problem solving, self-efficacy, and preservation of resources.

conclusionsThe expansion of local peer support structures and the possibility of a telephone helpline are recommended. Further research is needed.

Indexed as

Psychosocial Support SystemsTelephoneCounselingHotlinesHumansMedical Staffhealth worker safetymental healthpeer supportpsychosocial supportsupport by telephone

Identifiers

PMID36497526
PMCPMC9737483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.