Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36497523›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Inclusive Education in Primary and Secondary School: Perception of Teacher Training.

Natalia Triviño-Amigo, David Manuel Mendoza-Muñoz, Noelia Mayordomo-Pinilla, Sabina Barrios-Fernández, Nicolás Contreras-Barraza, Miseldra Gil-Marín, Dante Castillo, Carmen Galán-Arroyo, Jorge Rojo-Ramos

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Natalia Triviño-AmigoSocial Impact and Innovation in Health (InHEALTH) Research Group, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Extremadura, 10003 Cáceres, Spain.
David Manuel Mendoza-MuñozPromoting a Healthy Society Research Group (PHeSO), Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Extremadura, 10003 Cáceres, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5797-7419
Noelia Mayordomo-PinillaPromoting a Healthy Society Research Group (PHeSO), Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Extremadura, 10003 Cáceres, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8041-1525
Sabina Barrios-FernándezSocial Impact and Innovation in Health (InHEALTH) Research Group, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Extremadura, 10003 Cáceres, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7128-5451
Nicolás Contreras-BarrazaFacultad de Economía y Negocios, Universidad Andrés Bello, Viña del Mar 2531015, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-6729-4398
Miseldra Gil-MarínPublic Policy Observatory, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Santiago 7500912, Chile.ORCID 0000-0003-2553-5020
Dante CastilloCentro de Estudios e Investigación Enzo Faletto, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago 9170022, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-5648-0627
Carmen Galán-ArroyoPromoting a Healthy Society Research Group (PHeSO), Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Extremadura, 10003 Cáceres, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8750-0267
Jorge Rojo-RamosPhysical Activity for Education, Performance and Health (PAEPH) Research Group, Faculty of Sports Sciences, University of Extremadura, 10003 Cáceres, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6542-7828
Universidad de Extremadura · ESUniversidad Andrés Bello · CLUniversidad Autónoma de Chile · CLUniversidad de Santiago de Chile · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInclusive education is one of the main objectives of the educational system toward achieving equal opportunities among students. To this end, teacher training plays an important role in the different educational stages.

objectivesTo analyze the perceived readiness of teachers for inclusive education and to see the differences in primary and secondary education.

methodsA total of 961 active teachers from public schools, 53.3% Primary and 46.7% Secondary Education, were analyzed by means of a questionnaire on Teachers' perceptions about their preparation for inclusive education and the CEFI-R instrument.

resultsThere are statistically significant differences between the two stages in the first questionnaire (question 1:

conclusionsThis study shows that there is a large percentage of teachers who believe that their initial training is insufficient to deal with student diversity. In addition, most of them state that continuous training has helped them to improve inclusive education and that they would be willing to attend training courses on inclusion, although in secondary school, the predisposition is lower than in high school. On the other hand, teachers of both educational stages show a mostly favorable attitude according to the CEFI-R, being higher in primary than in secondary school. In this sense, the public administration has work to do.

Indexed as

Teacher TrainingAttitudeHumansPerceptionSchoolsSchool TeachersStudentseducational stagesinclusive educationperceptionspecial needsteacher training

Identifiers

PMID36497523
PMCPMC9735874
OpenAlexW4309691990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.