Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36497502›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Wellness Impacts of Social Capital Built in Online Peer Support Forums.

Sue Kilpatrick, Sherridan Emery, Jane Farmer, Peter Kamstra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sue KilpatrickCollege of Arts, Law and Education, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7005, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2473-9814
Sherridan EmeryCollege of Arts, Law and Education, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7005, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2949-2793
Jane FarmerSocial Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia.
Peter KamstraSocial Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3934-1403

Funding

Australian Research Council DP200100419
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study reported in this paper sought to explore whether and how social capital resources were generated on online peer support mental health forums, and how they were used by rural users to influence mental health outcomes. Interviews with rural users of three Australian online peer support mental health forums were analysed to identify interactions that accessed social capital resources and mental wellness outcomes that flowed from these. Analysis drew on a model of simultaneous building and using of social capital to uncover the nature of the social capital resources present on the forum and how they were built. Findings show that forums were sites for building 'knowledge resources' including archives of users' experiences of navigating mental illness and the mental health service system; and 'identity resources' including a willingness to contribute in line with forum values. The knowledge and identity resources built and available to rural users on the forums are facilitated by forum characteristics, which can be viewed as affordances of technology and institutional affordances. Operation by trusted organisations, moderation, a large network of users and anonymity created a safe space that encouraged reciprocity and where users exchanged information and social support that helped them maintain better mental wellness.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersSocial CapitalAustraliaHumansInternetSocial NetworkingSocial Supportonline peer support forumsreciprocityrural mental healthsocial capital

Identifiers

PMID36497502
PMCPMC9738771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.