Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36497493›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Clinical Potential of Circulating Cell-Free DNA (cfDNA) for Longitudinally Monitoring Clinical Outcomes in the First-Line Setting of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): A Real-World Prospective Study.

Valerio Gristina, Nadia Barraco, Maria La Mantia, Luisa Castellana, Lavinia Insalaco, Marco Bono, Alessandro Perez, Delia Sardo, Sara Inguglia, Federica Iacono and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Using cfDNA and ctDNA as Oncologic Markers: A Path to Clinical Validation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  11. Network approach in liquidomics landscape.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Valerio GristinaDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Nadia BarracoDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Maria La MantiaDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6027-1636
Luisa CastellanaDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Lavinia InsalacoDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Marco BonoDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7169-3463
Alessandro PerezDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Delia SardoDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Sara IngugliaDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Federica IaconoDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Sofia CutaiaDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2639-9713
Tancredi Didier Bazan RussoDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Edoardo FranciniDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4270-7023
Lorena IncorvaiaDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1199-7286
Giuseppe BadalamentiDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2478-8838
Antonio RussoDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Antonio GalvanoDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4365-5683
Viviana BazanDepartment of Experimental Biomedicine and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the increasing implementation of targeted and immunotherapy-based treatments, the prognosis of patients with advanced NSCLC remains dismal. We prospectively evaluated longitudinal plasma cfDNA kinetics as an early marker of therapeutic efficacy in patients with advanced NSCLC undergoing standard first-line treatments.

methodsFrom February 2020 to May 2022, treatment-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC were consecutively enrolled at the Medical Oncology Unit of the Paolo Giaccone University Hospital, Palermo (Italy). We quantified cfDNA in terms of ng/μL using a Qubit

resultsA total of 315 liquid biopsy samples were collected from 63 patients at baseline, with a total of 235 paired plasma samples from 47 patients at disease re-evaluation. A fair concordance was observed between early and durable radiographic and cfDNA response (Cohen's kappa coefficient = 0.001); 11 and 18 patients receiving TKI (Pearson's chi-squared test = 4.278; Cohen's kappa coefficient = 0.039) and IO treatments (Pearson's chi-squared test = 7.481; Cohen's kappa coefficient = 0.006) showed a significant and durable association between cfDNA dynamics and the first radiologic evaluation, whereas among the 18 patients undergoing CT, no significant correlation was observed (Pearson's chi-squared test = 0.720; Cohen's kappa coefficient = 0.396). The ECOG-PS 2 patients presented with the mean baseline cfDNA levels 2.6-fold higher than those with ECOG-PS 0-1 (1.71 vs. 0.65 ng/µL;

conclusionsOur real-world study demonstrates that quantitative changes in cfDNA values correlated with responses to therapy and relapse of disease in treatment-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC undergoing TKI- and IO-based treatments.

Indexed as

cfDNAECOG-PS 2liquid biopsyNSCLCtreatment monitoring

Identifiers

PMID36497493
PMCPMC9735435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.