ArticleCancers2022
TRICIN: A Phase II Trial on the Efficacy of Topical TRIchloroacetic Acid in Patients with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia.
Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Topical vaginal drug therapy in cervical cancer management: a review of clinical trials and preclinical evidence.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
- The Role of Medical Therapies in the Management of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Efficacy of Topical Treatment of Low-Risk Cervical Preinvasive Lesions with Glycyrrhizinic Acid.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Data on non-surgical treatment approaching persistent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) are scarce. Retrospective analysis suggest high efficacy of topical treatment with trichloroacetic acid (TCA). This prospective phase II study set out to investigate the efficacy of a single application of 85% TCA in the treatment of CIN I/II. Patients with CIN I/II were treated a single time with 85% TCA. After three and six months colposcopic, histologic, and HPV evaluation was performed. The primary endpoint was treatment efficacy defined as complete histologic remission six months after treatment. The secondary endpoint was HPV clearance six months after treatment. A total of 102 patients with CIN I/II were included into this trial. Complete histologic remission rates were 75.5% and 78.4% three and six months after TCA treatment, respectively. Clearance rates of HPV 16, 18 and other high risk types were 76.5%, 91.7%, 68.7% after six months, respectively. Side effects of TCA were mild and lasted usually less than 30 min. This is the first prospective trial reporting high histologic complete remission rates in patients with CIN I/II after a single 85% TCA treatment. In the future, TCA may represent an effective and feasible non-surgical treatment approach for CIN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.