Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36497378›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Multi-Stage Classification-Based Deep Learning for Gleason System Grading Using Histopathological Images.

Kamal Hammouda, Fahmi Khalifa, Norah Saleh Alghamdi, Hanan Darwish, Ayman El-Baz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kamal HammoudaBioImaging Laboratory, Bioengineering Department, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA.
Fahmi KhalifaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD 21251, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3318-2851
Norah Saleh AlghamdiDepartment of Computer Sciences, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh 11564, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-6421-6001
Hanan DarwishMathematics Department, Faculty of Science, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt.
Ayman El-BazBioImaging Laboratory, Bioengineering Department, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7264-1323

Funding

Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University PNURSP2022R40
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this work, we introduced an automated diagnostic system for Gleason system grading and grade groups (GG) classification using whole slide images (WSIs) of digitized prostate biopsy specimens (PBSs). Our system first classifies the Gleason pattern (GP) from PBSs and then identifies the Gleason score (GS) and GG. We developed a comprehensive DL-based approach to develop a grading pipeline system for the digitized PBSs and consider GP as a classification problem (not segmentation) compared to current research studies (deals with as a segmentation problem). A multilevel binary classification was implemented to enhance the segmentation accuracy for GP. Also, we created three levels of analysis (pyramidal levels) to extract different types of features. Each level has four shallow binary CNN to classify five GP labels. A majority fusion is applied for each pixel that has a total of 39 labeled images to create the final output for GP. The proposed framework is trained, validated, and tested on 3080 WSIs of PBS. The overall diagnostic accuracy for each CNN is evaluated using several metrics: precision (PR), recall (RE), and accuracy, which are documented by the confusion matrices.The results proved our system's potential for classifying all five GP and, thus, GG. The overall accuracy for the GG is evaluated using two metrics, PR and RE. The grade GG results are between 50% to 92% for RE and 50% to 92% for PR. Also, a comparison between our CNN architecture and the standard CNN (ResNet50) highlights our system's advantage. Finally, our deep-learning system achieved an agreement with the consensus grade groups.

Indexed as

classificationdeep learninggleason systemgrade groupsprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID36497378
PMCPMC9738124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.