Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36497373›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Clinical Score to Predict Recurrence in Patients with Stage II and Stage III Colon Cancer.

David Viñal, Sergio Martinez-Recio, Daniel Martinez-Perez, Iciar Ruiz-Gutierrez, Diego Jimenez-Bou, Jesús Peña-Lopez, Maria Alameda-Guijarro, Gema Martin-Montalvo, Antonio Rueda-Lara, Laura Gutierrez-Sainz and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David ViñalDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
Sergio Martinez-RecioDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
Daniel Martinez-PerezDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
Iciar Ruiz-GutierrezDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
Diego Jimenez-BouDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
Jesús Peña-LopezDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
Maria Alameda-GuijarroDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
Gema Martin-MontalvoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
Antonio Rueda-LaraDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
Laura Gutierrez-SainzDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
Maria Elena PalaciosDepartment of Pathology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
Ana Belén CustodioDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
Ismael GhanemDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
Jaime FeliuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Catedra UAM-AMGEN, CIBERONC, 28046 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4867-1420
Nuria Rodríguez-SalasDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, CIBERONC, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
Hospital Universitario La Paz · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The prognosis of patients with stage II and stage III colon cancer is heterogeneous. Clinical and pathological characteristics, such as tumor budding, may help to further refine the recurrence risk. Methods: We included all the patients with localized colon cancer at Hospital Universitario La Paz from October 2016 to October 2021. We built a prognostic score for recurrence in the training cohort based on multivariate cox regression analysis and categorized the patients into two risk groups. Results: A total of 440 patients were included in the training cohort. After a median follow-up of 45 months, 81 (18%) patients had a first tumor recurrence. T4, N2, and high tumor budding remained with a p value <0.05 at the last step of the multivariate cox regression model for time to recurrence (TTR). We assigned 2 points to T4 and 1 point to N2 and high tumor budding. Forty-five percent of the patients were assigned to the low-risk group (score = 0). Compared to the high-risk group (score 1−4), patients in the low-risk group had a significantly longer TTR (hazard ratio for disease recurrence of 0.14 (95%CI: 0.00 to 0.90; p < 0.045)). The results were confirmed in the validation cohort. Conclusions: In our study, we built a simple score to predict tumor recurrence based on T4, N2, and high tumor budding. Patients in the low-risk group, that comprised 44% of the cohort, had an excellent prognosis.

Indexed as

adjuvantchemotherapycolonic neoplasmstumor budding

Identifiers

PMID36497373
PMCPMC9735724
OpenAlexW4310384208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.