Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36497368›Full record

ReviewCancers2022

Diagnostics Using Non-Invasive Technologies in Dermatological Oncology.

Simone Soglia, Javiera Pérez-Anker, Nelson Lobos Guede, Priscila Giavedoni, Susana Puig, Josep Malvehy

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06732609 (Clinical Evaluation and Characterization of Normal Perioral Tissue With a New Advanced Videodermoscopy Method. A Pilot Study on Dental Students.), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06732609 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Clinical Evaluation and Characterization of Normal Perioral Tissue With a New Advanced Videodermoscopy Method. A Pilot Study on Dental Students.

TypeobservationalSponsorFondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCSRan2024 to 2025Enrolled80ConditionsOral Mucosal Disorder
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Line-field confocal optical coherence tomography for actinic cheilitis: A descriptive study.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Histology and line-field confocal optical coherence tomography in granuloma faciale: A single case study.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Simone SogliaMelanoma Unit, Dermatology Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Universitat de Barcelona, 08001 Barcelona, Spain.
Javiera Pérez-AnkerMelanoma Unit, Dermatology Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Universitat de Barcelona, 08001 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6959-7250
Nelson Lobos GuedeMelanoma Unit, Dermatology Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Universitat de Barcelona, 08001 Barcelona, Spain.
Priscila GiavedoniMelanoma Unit, Dermatology Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Universitat de Barcelona, 08001 Barcelona, Spain.
Susana PuigMelanoma Unit, Dermatology Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Universitat de Barcelona, 08001 Barcelona, Spain.
Josep MalvehyMelanoma Unit, Dermatology Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Universitat de Barcelona, 08001 Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

CERCA Programme by Generalitat de Catalunya, Spain; AGAUR 2017_SGR_1134CIBER de Enfermedades Raras of the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain PI15/00956European Commission under the 6th Framework Programme LSHC-CT-2006-018702 (GenoMEL)European Commission under the 7th Framework Programme, Diagnoptics, and the European Commision HORIZON2020 Framework Programme, iTobos and QualitopFondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias (Spain), PI15/00716Fundació La Marató de TV3 201331-30"Fundación Científica de la Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer" GCB15152978SOEN,ISCIII-Subdireccion General de Evaluacion and European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), "a way to make Europe" PI18/00419The National Cancer Institute (NCI) of the US National Institute of Health (NIH) (CA83115)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing incidence of skin cancer, with its associated mortality and morbidity, has in recent years led to the developing of new non-invasive technologies, which allow an earlier and more accurate diagnosis. Some of these, such as digital photography, 2D and 3D total-body photography and dermoscopy are now widely used and others, such as reflectance confocal microscopy and optical coherence tomography, are limited to a few academic and referral skin cancer centers because of their cost or the long training period required. Health care professionals involved in the treatment of patients with skin cancer need to know the implications and benefits of new non-invasive technologies for dermatological oncology. In this article we review the characteristics and usability of the main diagnostic imaging methods available today.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencediagnosticshigh frequency ultrasoundimagingimaging techniquesLC-OCTOCTRCMskin cancertotal body photography (TBP)

Identifiers

PMID36497368
PMCPMC9738560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.