Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36497348›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Radiotherapy with Helium Ions Has the Potential to Improve Both Endocrine and Neurocognitive Outcome in Pediatric Patients with Ependymoma.

Ricarda Wickert, Thomas Tessonnier, Maximilian Deng, Sebastian Adeberg, Katharina Seidensaal, Line Hoeltgen, Jürgen Debus, Klaus Herfarth, Semi B Harrabi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ricarda WickertDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Thomas TessonnierDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Maximilian DengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Sebastian AdebergDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8463-514X
Katharina SeidensaalDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Line HoeltgenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Jürgen DebusDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Klaus HerfarthDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Semi B HarrabiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DE

Funding

Dietmar Hopp Stiftung 1DH1811398
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ependymomas are the third most-frequent pediatric brain tumors. To prevent local recurrence, the resection site should be irradiated. Compared to photon radiation treatment, proton therapy often achieves even better results regarding target coverage and organ-sparing. Due to their physical properties, helium ions could further reduce side effects, providing better protection of healthy tissue despite similar target coverage. In our in silico study, 15 pediatric ependymoma patients were considered. All patients underwent adjuvant radiotherapeutic treatment with active-scanned protons at Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT). Both helium ion and highly conformal IMRT plans were calculated to evaluate the potential dosimetric advantage of ion beam therapy compared to the current state-of-the-art photon-based treatments. To estimate the potential clinical benefit of helium ions, normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) were calculated. Target coverage was comparable in all three modalities. As expected, the integral dose absorbed by healthy brain tissue could be significantly reduced with protons by up to -48% vs. IMRT. Even compared to actively scanned protons, relative dose reductions for critical neuronal structures of up to another -39% were achieved when using helium ions. The dose distribution of helium ions is significantly superior when compared to proton therapy and IMRT due to the improved sparing of OAR. In fact, previous studies could clearly demonstrate that the dosimetric advantage of protons translates into a measurable clinical benefit for pediatric patients with brain tumors. Given the dose-response relationship of critical organs at risk combined with NTCP calculation, the results of our study provide a strong rationale that the use of helium ions has the potential to even further reduce the risk for treatment related sequelae.

Indexed as

ependymomahelium ionsIMRTion beam therapylate sequelaenormal tissue complication probabilitypediatric brain tumorsprotons

Identifiers

PMID36497348
PMCPMC9736041
OpenAlexW4310191248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.