Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36497310›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Evaluation of Static DNA Ploidy Analysis Using Conventional Brush Biopsy-Based Cytology Samples as an Adjuvant Diagnostic Tool for the Detection of a Malignant Transformation in Potentially Oral Malignant Diseases: A Prospective Study.

Natalie Bechstedt, Natalia Pomjanski, Martin Schramm, Torsten W Remmerbach

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Application of artificial intelligence in oral potentially malignant disorders: current opinions and future barriers.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Natalie BechstedtDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery, Section of Clinical and Experimental Oral Medicine, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstraße 10-14, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Natalia PomjanskiDepartment of Cytopathology, Institute of Pathology, Heinrich Heine University, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Martin SchrammDepartment of Cytopathology, Institute of Pathology, Heinrich Heine University, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Torsten W RemmerbachDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery, Section of Clinical and Experimental Oral Medicine, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstraße 10-14, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEUniversity Hospital Leipzig · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe accuracy of DNA image cytometry as an investigation method for potentially malignant disorders of the oral cavity is currently still a subject of controversy, due to inconsistently applied definitions of DNA aneuploidy, small cohorts and different application techniques of the method. The aim of this study was to examine the accuracy of the method as a supplementary diagnostic tool in addition to the cytological examination using internationally consented definitions for DNA aneuploidy.

methodsA total of 602 samples from 467 patients with various oral lesions were included in this prospective study. Brush biopsies from each patient were first cytologically examined and categorized by a pathologist, second evaluated using DNA image cytometry, and finally compared to either histological biopsy result or clinical outcome.

resultsUsing the standard definition of DNA aneuploidy, we achieved a sensitivity of 93.5%, a positive predictive value for the detection of malignant cells of 98.0%, and an area under the curve of 0.96 of DNA ploidy analysis for the detection of severe oral epithelial dysplasia, carcinoma in situ or oral squamous cell carcinoma. Importantly, using logistic regression and a two-step model, we were able to describe the increased association between DNA-ICM and the detection of malignant cells (OR = 201.6) as a secondary predictor in addition to cytology (OR = 11.90).

conclusionIn summary, this study has shown that DNA ploidy analysis based on conventional specimens of oral brush biopsies is a highly sensitive, non-invasive, patient-friendly method that should be considered as an additional diagnostic tool for detecting malignant changes in the oral cavity.

Indexed as

aneuploidybrush biopsyDNA image cytometrymass screening tooloral canceroral potentially malignant disorders

Identifiers

PMID36497310
PMCPMC9735754
OpenAlexW4310171566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.