Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36497304›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Tumor Location and a Tumor Volume over 2.8 cc Predict the Prognosis for Japanese Localized Prostate Cancer.

Haruki Baba, Shinichi Sakamoto, Xue Zhao, Yasutaka Yamada, Junryo Rii, Ayumi Fujimoto, Manato Kanesaka, Nobuyoshi Takeuchi, Tomokazu Sazuka, Yusuke Imamura and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Haruki BabaDepartment of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba 260-8670, Japan.
Shinichi SakamotoDepartment of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba 260-8670, Japan.
Xue ZhaoDepartment of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba 260-8670, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4818-3064
Yasutaka YamadaDepartment of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba 260-8670, Japan.
Junryo RiiDepartment of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba 260-8670, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6093-3190
Ayumi FujimotoDepartment of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba 260-8670, Japan.
Manato KanesakaDepartment of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba 260-8670, Japan.
Nobuyoshi TakeuchiDepartment of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba 260-8670, Japan.
Tomokazu SazukaDepartment of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba 260-8670, Japan.
Yusuke ImamuraDepartment of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba 260-8670, Japan.
Koichiro AkakuraDepartment of Urology, Japan Community Health-Care Organization Tokyo Shinjuku Medical Center, Tokyo 162-8543, Japan.
Tomohiko IchikawaDepartment of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba 260-8670, Japan.
Chiba University · JPTokyo Yamate Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Objective: Our study investigated the prognostic value of tumor volume and location in prostate cancer patients who received radical prostatectomy (RP). (2) Methods: The prognostic significance of tumor volume and location, together with other clinical factors, was studied using 557 patients who received RP. (3) Results: The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve identified the optimal cutoff value of tumor volume as 2.8 cc for predicting biochemical recurrence (BCR). Cox regression analysis revealed that a tumor in the posterior area (p = 0.031), peripheral zone (p = 0.0472), and tumor volume ≥ 2.8 cc (p < 0.0001) were predictive factors in univariate analysis. After multivariate analysis, tumor volume ≥ 2.8 cc (p = 0.0225) was an independent predictive factor for BCR. Among them, a novel risk model was established using tumor volume and location in the posterior area and peripheral zone. The progression-free survival (PFS) of patients who met the three criteria (unfavorable group) was significantly worse than other groups (p ≤ 0.001). Furthermore, multivariate analysis showed that the unfavorable risk was an independent prognostic factor for BCR. The prognostic significance of our risk model was observed in low- to intermediate-risk patients, although it was not observed in high-risk patients. (4) Conclusion: Tumor volume (≥2.8 cc) and localization (posterior/peripheral zone) may be a novel prognostic factor in patients undergoing RP.

Indexed as

biochemical recurrenceprognostic factorprostate cancertumor locationtumor volume

Identifiers

PMID36497304
PMCPMC9740872
OpenAlexW4310171569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.